[JDW11235]

Actually, it was a debate, and not an argument, which is a loose interpretation of the word “debate”:

de·bate (d-bt)
v. de·bat·ed, de·bat·ing, de·bates
v.intr.
1. To consider something; deliberate.

Now, if you mean you’d like to see more of where they disagree, well, that may be worthwhile. However, I personally loved the debate (not “bickering”) format, because they actually were able to address issues, although I don’t agree with many of their ideas, I do, however, believe that Cain, and to a lesser degree, Gingrich, both want to do what is best for our country (even if they aren’t sure what it is yet), or at least improve it.

[Huck]

It's not either agree or bicker. They should have called this the Lincoln-Lincoln debates. They didn't challenge each other on anything.

The process of rational argument is hygienic. What we got instead was a televised fundraiser/gabfest. It was interesting for about 20 minutes.