Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weighing Pentagon Cuts, Panetta Faces Deep Pressures
NYTIMES ^ | 11/06 | THOM SHANKER and ELISABETH BUMILLER

Posted on 11/06/2011 7:57:57 PM PST by RummyChick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Cicero

Wasn’t he one of the more classier/least partisan showing; slick willy lawyers?


21 posted on 11/07/2011 9:19:28 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Our Tea Bag Rep..Ryan, supports the cuts to military entitlements.


22 posted on 11/07/2011 10:09:11 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/topsecretamerica/

The amount of redundancy in our “intelligence” gathering entities is absolutely insane. But let’s not make any cuts there....


23 posted on 11/07/2011 10:24:10 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

In what he described as the most sensitive of the potential cuts facing an all-volunteer force, Mr. Panetta said the Pentagon was considering raising fees for the military’s health insurance program, Tricare. Today, military retirees and families, who are guaranteed Tricare for life, pay only $460 a year in fees — far below what they would pay if they worked for a private employer — although a modest increase for new enrollees began last month.

The White House and Pentagon have made clear that Tricare fee increases would be phased in over a few years and would affect current retirees and troops serving today when they retire. Health care costs for the Pentagon, the nation’s largest employer, total $50 billion a year, or about a tenth of its base budget. Ten years ago, health care cost the Pentagon $19 billion, equal to about $25 billion in today’s dollars.

This will have a very adverse affect on our retirement. It is not fair to compare the military to the private sector. The military recieves more in benefits because they take more risks, make less money and make more sacrifices than most in the private sector. There may very well be protests in DC that make the OCW crowd look like girl scouts.


24 posted on 11/07/2011 11:02:48 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

I believe they are going to protect most military benefits using them as an excuse to raise taxes.


25 posted on 11/07/2011 11:09:33 AM PST by OldGoatCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee

Good points


26 posted on 11/07/2011 11:10:26 AM PST by OldGoatCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cherry

“....we need soldiers more than we need bureacrats....”

The left/Liberals always see Defense as a financial affront for their pet social programs.They take their cue from European Socialists who built their programs on the backs of American taxpayers that provided the military might/prowess for their national defense....

If only we didn’t have all that military we’d be as great as Europe..../s


27 posted on 11/07/2011 12:19:22 PM PST by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson