1) Oh okay so you think the media does not have a left wing bias???? Please don’t tell me you REALLY believe that!
2) Joe reported what he found out as he should. However, you wanted him to go some quest without all the facts and with what authority? There are procedures when you find an employee doing something wrong. Joe did the proper response. To say he some how knew all the facts and participated in some sort of cover up is B.S.
It’s obvious you have some sort of beef agains Joe Paterno. Your judgement of him at best is pure assinime.
You know, sports journalists are not all one monolithic beast that move & operate as one tentacled giant.
However, you wanted him to go some quest without all the facts...
He had one fact in front of him: A reliable eyewitness who saw his former defensive coach sodomizing a kid.
Secondly if you bothered to read what the prosecution has put out, this wasn't new news. There was already info flying about in 1998. And the prosecution condemns people like Schultz for doing nothing then as well.
It’s obvious you have some sort of beef agains Joe Paterno
There ya go again. Judging internal motives. I guess you just can't help yourself. You'd rather side with the pedophiles and those who cover their sodomy rapes up that mention even a single word about the victims.
You're pathetic like the Penn State crowd.
I have nothing against Paterno, Penn State, and until this thread, really had no idea about his politics (couldn’t care less). So you will not be able to use your rather spurious argument against me.
Let’s put you, sprite, in Joe’s shoes.
Someone you have trusted for decades is accused of homosexually raping an at-risk, vulnerable child in a univ facility. And you have been given a first hand account by a witness to the crime.
What would you do?
What Joe did? Or something more?