[omega4179]

What if we nominate Cain then it is revealed that one of the anonymous women was found to have been harrassed? I am starting to wonder if we can’t take that possibility. It could be time for a new #NonRomney

[mazda77]

"What if"

What if Romney did it

What if Gingrich did it

What if Huntsman did it

What if Perry did it

What if Paul did it

What if Santorum did it

What if Bachmann did it

What if you did it?

[Stepan12]

This whole sexual harassment thing is garbage. It is just lawyers acting like pimps and pornographers by making a buck of a woman’s body; however, the pimps and pornographers are not as sleazy because they are not as hypocritically self righteous about what they are doing!

[mel]

From what I have seen so far, I don’t think that is going to happen. These women are bimbos.

[mel]

Palin was attacked viciously. Remember all the stories about the son, the daughter, cocaine. etc. Bachman was said to not be stable. Then, Perry was racist. Let’s see who is next. Everyone who is in the lead at any time will be attacked viciously.

[yup2394871293]

People who are going to vote in the upcoming primaries are probably all going to asking that question. I think that either way the truth will come out, but not on anyone's time table. Sexual harassment is bad, but it's hardly relevant when an accuser no longer has anything to do with the accusee. I think this is an election year like no other because there are so many critical issues on the table, and this isn't one of them. Certainly, we need a president that is honest, just, has good judgement, and isn't what many would call an a**hole. But we know who our opponent is going to be, we know how repugnant he is, and we know that he knows that the only way for him to be reelected is if the GOP is divided and distracted. We have to get enough people to do what is best before the primary season ends, because the chance of a decent third party candidate winning instead reelecting Obama is slim to none. I wish it was different, but that's the way it is.

And if both parties are doomed to take the country off the ledge either way, it hardly matters.

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

Thats not going to happen.If you know Cain you wouldnt even think that.There have never even a whisper of this kind of crap regarding Herman Cain.UNTIL NOW OF COURSE.

[Magic Fingers]

Compared to the possibility of pulling the country out of its economic nosedive, I don’t care.

[roaddog727]

“What if we nominate Cain then it is revealed that one of the anonymous women was found to have been harrassed? “

Be serious.

SLL this stuff coming up about Cain is Lame.

[ThermoNuclearWarrior]

You're falling for the liberal strategy they used against Sarah Palin. They use a constant, and vicious attack against certain Conservatives they fear. Their goal is to make us Conservatives start questioning whether they are electable or not. It worked against Sarah Palin, and started making a lot of people start thinking she couldn't be elected even though they preferred her to begin with, but then switched their support before she even announced she wouldn't be running. They aren't going to be able to destroy Herman Cain unless we allow them to do so by dropping our support of him based on their liberal lies.

Cain has been attacked as viciously as possible, and it hasn't done much damage to his campaign, and has even helped him raise much more cash than he was getting previously. If that couldn't derail the Cain train by now, then they won't be capable of doing so, unless too many Conservatives like you fall for their strategy. We should all stick with Cain, and should never allow the liberal mainstream media to cause us to drop support for a Conservative candidate, based on their manipulating tactics.

http://www.hermancain.com/