No sir. You don’t get to ask me a question until you respond to my response to your assertion that the DA “was involved with far more serious cases than the 1998 Sandusky case”.
You tell us what could be more important than a pedophile ring operating in the shower room of Penn State for at least a decade?
You tell us what could be more important than a pedophile ring operating in the shower room of Penn State for at least a decade?
OK, if you go back to the grand jury report you will find that there was not enough evidence to conclude that a pedohile ring was operating out of PSU. What was found in the 1998 incident was one incident that Sandusky showered with a boy on the campus of PSU. It is understandable that the DA could conclude it as an isolated incident and could not be successfully prosecuted. DA's make that choice many times in rape cases if the victim does not want to pursue the case.