NOT true. The child told everything. Sandusky was ON TAPE in a phone call from the child’s mother ADMITTING it and said he wished he was dead. Gricar HAD that evidence of admission.
Where in the grand jury report does it say that Sandusky sexually contacted that boy in that incident?. Nowhere! It says that he showered naked with the kid and bear hugged the kid but it doesn't mention touching the genitals. The difference difference between what Sandusky did and what was needed to prove sexual contact is probably why Gricar chose not to prosecute.
Yeah, what Sandusky did sure as hell was kinky and indicative of a wierd mind but, by itself, not enough to prosecute.
“In that 1998 case, Gricar had the mother of one boy confront Sandusky in her home while police hid in another room.
According to the grand jury report, Sandusky admitted to taking a naked shower and touching the boy, asked for forgiveness and said, “I wish I were dead.”
About six weeks after the incident, police closed the case.”
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/gricars_nephew_on_1998_sandusk.html