Actually, over the last few days, I can’t help but think Cain’s accusers have more in common with the stripper who accused the Duke Lacrosse Team of rape or the hotel maid that accused that French clown, than with ordinary women. Their records are bad enough that they’re not credible witnesses.
On a side note, it appears that Michael Savage was the only one who called the incident with the french clown correctly.
The question is, who recruited these women, and fed them the script to use?
My wife is an “ordinary” woman. If someone made sexual advances to her they’d be hospitalized. She’s livid over these accusations against Cain. And that’s all they are; accusations.
For the record, Cain was not a party to the NRA agreements. He was already gone from that organization. And they weren’t payoffs but termination settlements. There’s no reason why he’d have knowledge of them. In fact, he disputed the charges (For those in Rio Linda such as others on this thread, knowing the charges is separate from knowing what’s in the agreement).
We continue to support Cain because we see an honorable man being politically murdered through innuendo. For all of you who believe “where there’s smoke there’s fire” or, “all these women mean there has to be something to this”, are you really so naive to think the opposition, whether democrat or republican establishment, wouldn’t stoop to these tactics to ruin a challenger to their anointed one? Think again.
If anyone among us is shameful and base, it’s those who won’t give a person the benefit of the doubt when “allegations” are all there is; whether because of political calculation or just meanness.