Here’s one of a MAN doing the same things...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2725783/posts
Oh, he’s an evil b@$tard and should be strung up by his whoo-ha.
But here’s a women molesting another boy...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2718725/posts
And it’s perfectly FINE!
Why, according to one poster, a 17 year old boy CAN’T be taken advantage of sexually. (So if a gay teacher has sex with a 17 year old buy, that’s OK? He just said that they had good judgement and couldn’t be taken advantage of sexually...?)
The boy who the man molested was 11 years old, the boy the women had sex with was 17 years old, the age of consent in that state, MN, being 16. Are you saying you can't see a difference?