My objective is to keep Romney from getting the nomination.
I like Perry among others. He is pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment and has done some good things in Texas, such as tort reform.
I have also been able to name off the things he's done that I don't like. However, I see the good outweighing the bad and I see you and your tiny-hyena pack twisting and distorting the truth. Your Groupthink Leader even uses laughable publications such as Rolling Stone to support her smears.
Do not think you can speak for me.
You're a camp-follower - one of those who engages in irrational worshippy behavior. You can't understand objective reviews of the field.
I do not worship Cain as you do. No candidate is perfect, and that most certainly includes the object of your worship, Cain.
You groupthink worshippy types hate it when you see people like us who don't fall for your relentless hyperbole.
I've watched the media lie and distort for years. If they can't sway me, you tiny hyenas certainly can't.
It's called thinking for oneself. Learn how to do it.
Not only are you a Perry supporter but for many weeks you were an “enforcer”. You always appeared after those of us who thought Perry was a moron made our entrance. You were the Madame DeFarge of the Perry campaign.
I guess now that he’s bombed so spectacularly, you’re trying to scrub your spots.
Hmm who has the best chance of that?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2806501/posts?page=1
Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll.
Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support.
Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama.