Re: “Actually, I have only seen four or five freepers who are pro boy rape in defense of materialism and idols. “ You will find zero Freepers who are pro boy rape.
Remember Duke Lacrosse and Mike Nifong, though? How about Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley? Sharpton acted on hearsay evidence (from the actual purported victim) and bought himself a big fat defamation suit he lost. Remember the Amiraults and Grant Snowden?
All good reasons to be careful of acting on hearsay.
I beleive the boys. There are twenty of them. And McQueary saw one of the boys - a ten year old - being raped. That was the last thing he wanted to see - he adored Sandusky and Penn State football.
Take a minute and watch Jon Ritchie’s interview so you will understand the psychology involved there.
There is very important things to learn about ethics, the gay agenda and man rape methods in this whole story. There is such a thing as child rape and it’s not all a lie. You have to discern every situation from the point of view of being a man who protects boys and girls from rape. Joe was not that man.
The boys were falsely accused.
Neither was an issue of 'hearsay'.
“”Re: “Actually, I have only seen four or five freepers who are pro boy rape in defense of materialism and idols.”
You will find zero Freepers who are pro boy rape.”
Very true, but I’ve seen several here who are too ready to excuse it because they’re ignorant of the law, are pu$$ies or are just terminally stupid and confuse legal procedures with moral responsibility. Lord, HELP US!!
JC