Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TN4Bush
So a person is not allowed to clarify a question that is ambiguous before answering?

Good point. We can go back to a Sarah Palin interview in which she was asked about "The Bush Doctrine". The media response was that she had fumbled the answer. It turned out that the media could not define the Bush Doctrine either.

Having the interviewer clarify the question is a smart tactic. The media is not your friend.

17 posted on 11/14/2011 5:00:25 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I won't vote for Romney. I won't vote for Perry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

At least there was a Bush Doctrine!

Obama constantly says two diametrically opposed thoughts in every sentence. What WAS his position on Libya? No one could say that in 30 seconds. No one really could say it at all, as Obama shifted all the time on the subject.


77 posted on 11/14/2011 5:36:12 PM PST by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Correct. That’s because there were 4 Bush Doctrines if I recall.


93 posted on 11/14/2011 5:44:21 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson