Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: struwwelpeter

Quigley was a brilliant historian. His application of scientific method and anthropological science to history remains unparalleled today. Most historians relate facts and events. Quigley looked for the underlying patterns, the drivers of human behavior and culture.

This, of course was quite at odds with modern prevailing historical wisdom, most of which is infected with the Marxist outlook - the denial of culture or individual conscience in the role of human affairs.


6 posted on 11/14/2011 10:02:18 PM PST by Noumenon (The only 'NO' a liberal understands is the one that arrives at muzzle velocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Noumenon

The first part of “Evolution” was terribly boring and dry but extremely insightful and important to his view. Just the discussion of the climatic change influencing the migration patterns of early man was fascinating.

I also found it very interesting that the copies of Tragedy and Hope in the Chicago library system had all been stolen. So I had to buy my own.


27 posted on 11/16/2011 11:28:49 AM PST by arrogantsob (Obama must Go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Noumenon
Most historians relate facts and events. Quigley looked for the underlying patterns, the drivers of human behavior and culture.

Sort of the Hari Seldon of his day. A precursor to the development of Psychohistory.

85 posted on 06/02/2017 10:38:12 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Good judgment comes from experience. And experience? Well, that comes from poor judgment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson