To: St. Louis Conservative; Kartographer; wmfights; P-Marlowe
I’ve been making this comparison for a few weeks now.
Gingrich is America’s Churchill.
Anyone who knows Churchill’s history of rejection by the Brits, and finally an acceptance of him as the man for that time, knows that the comparison is apt.
This is an outstanding article.
Gingrich is Churchill.
This is a time of crisis, and Gingrich, with all his warts, is the want for this time.
His competition pales in comparison to his ability, experience, and knowledge.
14 posted on
11/15/2011 7:01:39 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
To: xzins
Thanks for posting that, xzins. Wish I had time to sink my teeth into this topic, but other concerns are pressing today :(
To: xzins
Interesting way to look at it.
While the men have far different lives, the way they are percieved in their time may be an apt comparison.
35 posted on
11/15/2011 7:31:39 AM PST by
RockinRight
(One year from now, we have an opportunity to take our nation back.)
To: xzins
"The "brilliant failure" derided as a "genius without judgment" turns out to be the man of hard earned wisdom with rock hard principles and the best judgment after all. The man once seen as "erratic" is suddenly recognized as the man whose bone-deep understanding of history, strategy and human nature gives him the steely ability to see over the horizon while all around him are essentially blind. And displays the supreme virtue of being unafraid to act." Sounds right on to me.
45 posted on
11/15/2011 8:02:04 AM PST by
matthew fuller
((1) fully fund defense, (2) transform entitlement programs, and (3) do not raise taxes!)
To: xzins
Many similarities, but Newt does not have Churchill’s sense of humour.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson