Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

So, Kagan “might” be recused because of her own personal involvemant in the passage of this bill and personal statements in support of it while Thomas should be recused because of what his wife believes? How is that fair?


4 posted on 11/15/2011 1:46:51 PM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marstegreg
Let's hear it from the feminists. Haven't they been telling us husband and wife could have different careers, friends, likes and dislikes? In other words, they can think independently?

OK. Why should Justice Thomas recuse himself? Ridiculous.

6 posted on 11/15/2011 1:57:00 PM PST by July4 (Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: marstegreg

Recusal is a decision by the Justice in question. The liberals have no ethics or morals to do such a thing. They use the Constitution as a doormat, at best. They will lie, cheat, steal, etc., to further their liberal agenda. Period. Why is this even an issue? We already know the result. Thomas needs to stay in there no matter what.


13 posted on 11/15/2011 2:27:01 PM PST by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson