Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: QT3.14
I believe in WA (the state) it is called Physcal Control. It is my understanding that you can be sleeping in the back seat and as long as you have access to the key you are capable of operating the vehicle and considered in P C.

This reminds me of the female TV talk show host interview of a male gun owner. She said possession of a gun "equipped him" to commit murder. His retort was, "you're equipped to be a prostitute. Are you?". Until you actually use an object to commit an illegal act, it is pure conjecture about what you "could" do. Punishing people for acts they have not done amounts to prior restraint.

54 posted on 11/16/2011 1:45:10 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Myrddin

Of course.

If “Punishing people for acts they have not done amounts to prior restraint”, then we should not arrest a skinhead found in the dark carrying a can of gas and a pack of matches outside a black church because he got caught before he could commit the arson.

People are convicted all day for crimes of intent:
Attempted X
Possession of Y with intent to commit Z
Conspiracy to commit Q


59 posted on 11/16/2011 2:05:44 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson