Proof found for unifying quantum principle: Twenty-three-year-old conjecture set to guide...

Nature News ^ | 14 November 2011 | Eugenie Samuel Reich

[The Duke]

"So NOW can I cross-circuit to B?"

[grey_whiskers]

It's mathematical, but it has (if you will) "implications" as they say. See slide 11 within here.

Cheers!

[grey_whiskers]

Or, in English (being generous!)

Cheers!

[Windflier]

See "Beyond Einstein's Unified Field: Gravity and Electro-magnetism Redefined" John Brandenburg, PhD.

Thanks!

"Beyond Einstein's Unified Field: Gravity and Electro-magnetism Redefined" John Brandenburg, PhD.

[djf]

Here is a recent interview.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7863474644720138495

[Windflier]

Physicists are engineers but the opposite of this does not hold too accurately. That is, an engineer is a physist usually only at a basic level or narrow specialty.

I've actually observed the truth of your second statement, but never in the case of your first statement. Now, that's just a layman's observation. Your mileage may vary.

I suppose that the work of some theoretical physicists has produced solutions and insights that engineers were able to apply in the real world. That kind of thinking is something that I can admire and appreciate, because it leads to tangible advancements for everyone.

What I have a problem with, are all these government tit sucking eggheads who sit around postulating 11 dimensions, dark matter, the multiverse, etc. Perhaps their work will one day lead to something worthwhile that benefits the human race, but from where I sit, it's too far out for me to see.

[Bender2]

Re: “I’m pleased if the proof turns out to be correct," says Cardy...

Gadzooks, Cardy! If it's over 100 proof, it has quite a kick to it... but don't stop sipping less than 100 proof 'cause it may cause you to loose you buzz. Right, Deano?

You got it, Bend... just keep on drinking!

If red X above go to http://nuravebrainwave.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dean+Martin+winedrinker.png

[Wonder Warthog]

"I've actually observed the truth of your second statement, but never in the case of your first statement."

Almost always true in the case of "experimental physicists", almost never true in the case of "theoretical physicists".

There are some truly gifted individuals who can do both extremely well. Einstein was NOT one of them. I think Robert Bussard was.

I forget which high level physicist the comment was made of (it might even have been Einstein), that apparatus started to break as soon as he walked through the door..... :^)

[Condor51]

If the solution holds, it is likely to guide future attempts to explain physics beyond the current standard model.

Good, the stanard models always stink.
I want upgrade options like a Hemi, 409 with positraction, or GTO package.

[Eyes Unclouded]

[Windflier]

LOL! My point exactly.

[daisy mae for the usa]

save for later