Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969

McQuery could be making the incident up. He has changed his story and he has something to gain. Doesn’t mean Sandusky isn’t guilty of something, maybe just not this one thing.


2 posted on 11/17/2011 12:05:54 PM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: greatvikingone

Nope not buying it. This incident was in the evidence presented to the grand jury. Also, sandusky admitted on natl. Tv that he showered with boys in the penn st lockeroom. The guy failed to act to save his professional coching career. He could have saved countless boys from sexual abuse but instead tried to save his job.

He ended up losing the respect of a nation and has the rape of children on his soul. Jesus save me from making a mistake like this!


6 posted on 11/17/2011 12:13:36 PM PST by SpringtoLiberty (Liberty is on the march!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: greatvikingone
I believe he testified at the grand jury....if he has lied, he's going to jail....

besided this story goes along with all the other reported "incidences"....

12 posted on 11/17/2011 12:24:03 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: greatvikingone
I don't think he changed his story because he made anything up about Sandusky. I think he changed his story because the first way he told it (most likely the truth) made him look like a moral and mental midget, and he didn't realize until after he had told his story exactly how much of a moral and mental midget it made him appear.

Plain and simple, he's (now) trying to cover his own ass, so to speak...

21 posted on 11/17/2011 12:31:06 PM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25 percent more sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: greatvikingone

No, he saw what he saw, he is just making up parts to make himself better.


52 posted on 11/17/2011 1:20:32 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: greatvikingone

No, he saw what he saw, he is just making up parts to make himself look better.


53 posted on 11/17/2011 1:20:50 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson