Prior to the 1970s, a 47 year-old man having a "frank and open" discussion about sexual intercourse with teenagers who weren't his children would have been considered a pervert and would probably have been arrested for corrupting the morals of a minor.
Today, he's a "teacher" in an extremely exclusive school who gets paid to do this and is lauded by the "newspaper of record".
Sickening.
I should state, for the record, that this particular teacher used to be employed by a school I attended. I never had him for class but I remember walking into his classroom once and seeing some people casually leafing through one of his "sex-ed" books that was filled with homo-erotica.
And we wonder how Penn State scenarios happen?
1 posted on
11/18/2011 10:30:38 AM PST by
Antoninus
To: Antoninus
Not to excuse it, but it’s a private institution. If parents aren’t aware of what’s being taught with their tuition money, they soon will. They’ll have better luck getting him fired than parents of children in public school would.
2 posted on
11/18/2011 10:35:35 AM PST by
edpc
(Wilby 2012)
To: Antoninus
My kids team is running around talking about a McGangBang. I told him to knock it off and he said it was a Big Mac with hot sauce.
I can’t tell if he is serious.
3 posted on
11/18/2011 10:35:45 AM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
(To fix government, we need a rocket scientist. Oh, wait we have one!)
To: Antoninus
Indeed - he probably finds it titillating to speak to young people about sex in such a way. Of course, he calls it “educating.”
4 posted on
11/18/2011 10:35:54 AM PST by
PGR88
(I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
To: Antoninus
I found out recently, from some highschool teachers, that the “bases” have changed dramatically from when I was in High School in the 80s. For example “second base” now refers to oral sex.
That was stunning for me, and I’m fairly jaded.
To: Antoninus
In NYC public schools they now teach 11 year olds to do it.
This country is going down the toilet.
6 posted on
11/18/2011 10:37:17 AM PST by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: Antoninus
To: Antoninus
Give her a ring, then do your thing.
8 posted on
11/18/2011 10:37:53 AM PST by
struggle
To: Antoninus
this is simply an attack on Christianity and christian values.
To: Antoninus
For decades, liberals have told us over and over that:
1. Sex education and free condoms will limit unwanted pregnancies. Yet teh number of babies born out of wedlock..to single tgeenage girls, continues to increase. And among black teenage girls, it's scary...Every 15 years, another generation is born, and preordained to fail in life.
2. Smoking is bad..we know it..we'd had decades of anti-smoking PSAs, warnings on packages, billions spent by the governments on anti-smoking campaigns, yet the incidence of smoking among white middle-class, better educated females continues to increase..
Ya think??
12 posted on
11/18/2011 10:42:05 AM PST by
ken5050
To: Antoninus
13 posted on
11/18/2011 10:45:53 AM PST by
onedoug
(lf)
To: Antoninus
First base, second base, third base, home run, Al Vernacchio ticked off the classic baseball terms for sex acts. Poor Al probably never got to first base on account of foul balls.
17 posted on
11/18/2011 10:57:08 AM PST by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: Antoninus
Somehow I never quite made the connection before between Quakers and Sex
To: Antoninus
From the article, describing the teacher:
“Gay, with a partner of 17 years, he has ruddy cheeks, a quick smile and a plane of brown hair overhanging his brow, from which he must regularly wipe away sweat during intense discussions.”
Yeah, he sweats during “intense discussions.”
I’m sure it’s just because it’s all so INTENSE for him.
How much do you want to bet he gets a rise out of this and his sweating is related to being sexually aroused?
Disgusting.
20 posted on
11/18/2011 11:09:05 AM PST by
Conservaliberty
(If Paul and Palin were running mates, would their foreign policies be like matter and anti-matter?)
To: Antoninus
Wow. I’m a libertoonian and even I’m offended by this.
To: Antoninus
Prior to the 1970s, a 47 year-old man having a "frank and open" discussion about sexual intercourse with teenagers who weren't his children would have been considered a pervert and would probably have been arrested for corrupting the morals of a minor.I agree. Perverts will wrap themselves up in the cloak of being called "an educator" to get away with their sick fantasies.
31 posted on
11/18/2011 12:27:55 PM PST by
dragonblustar
(Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
To: Antoninus
I love how he told the one boy that penis size doesn’t matter...*snicker*
To: Antoninus
Arrayed before Vernacchio was a circle of small desks occupied by 22 teenagers, six male and the rest female
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Courses such as this ( especially male-female classes) break down the natural modesty that is naturally protective. But...Hey! That's the point of these classes...grooming the children for sexual exploitation.
44 posted on
11/18/2011 2:33:14 PM PST by
wintertime
(I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
To: Antoninus
45 posted on
11/18/2011 2:34:46 PM PST by
dfwgator
(I stand with Herman Cain.)
To: Antoninus
I think I learned everything I needed, September 1967...
STILL hot for Teacher!
46 posted on
11/18/2011 3:15:16 PM PST by
jaz.357
(The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong,)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson