So they are asking for 37 trillion for an “educated guess.”
And no one sees the folly in this?
From the raw dump. This is NOT confirmed by the claimed author, but if true (and other reports support the statment)
puts lie to the “call to authority “ argument made by IPCC etc...
The great danger of doing things the way we are, in our rush to prepare
these IPCC reports, is that we are not submitting this stuff to peer review
before using it. This makes it even more important that we bend over
backwards to get it right. I know it is a bother, but that is life. I am
genuinely sorry to be such a stickler about it, but there we are.
Best regards,
Barrie.
Dr A. Barrie Pittock
Post-Retirement Fellow*, Climate Impact Group
The bending over backward at least my mann has been show to not be the case.
No.
They are trying to guilt, panic and browbeat countries into giving them 37 trillion dollars based upon an educated guess AT BEST scenario.
We - you and I and probably everyone else who frequents this site - see the folly. Many, many others (I’d hazard a guess to say the vast majority) do not.