“Peter Lemiska is a freelance writer and former Senior Special Agent of the U.S. Secret Service.”
These guys/gals are trained to the core not to question the “duly elected” president's credentials...while on the job, same as out military.
I find it very interesting that a former Secret Service agent would publicly question Obama’s legitimacy, even after leaving the Service. He would know that these allegations could cause a potentially dangerous hint of hesitancy in the mind of any currently serving SS agents to take a bullet for a guy who possibly never should have been president and could be a total fraud to boot!
Maybe he knows that any thinking person would already have questions, and thinks the guys who would take the bullets deserve to have answers so they can serve in good conscience - like Lakin deserved to be able to serve in good conscience. Obama refused to set his conscience at ease, saying he was “amused” by the whole thing.
How anybody could be “amused” by somebody losing their life savings and career because they listened to their conscience telling them to keep an oath is beyond me. But when you look at the way Nancy Pelosi slams people who have a conscience you recognize that these critters have lost their consciences. When you see the people dead as a result of Fast & Furious, and the cover-ups and lying that every government agency did to obstruct justice, you see that there is no such thing as conscience where these people are concerned, even when it means innocent people will be murdered. Conscience is for quaint little peons who still have to follow the laws.
We are in very, very dangerous territory. Seems like Lemiska may be wise enough to recognize where this is headed. And by not getting bogged down in details he leaves the questions very clear: How can anybody say this doesn’t matter? How can anybody who affirms the rule of law think it is OK to ignore this much evidence as if it was inconsequential? How can anybody trust a system that doesn’t even think its purpose for existing matters?
I’d love to hear Congress, the courts, the media, and law enforcement all answer those very general worldview-based questions. How they can spend all their time arguing over gnats and still openly swallow these blatant camels is an explanation we all deserve to hear from them.
Police in my county spent a couple years and resources to catch a guy in my town who was making fake ID’s for illegals. But we’ve got Obama’s aunt and uncle who are both illegals with social security numbers, and Obama who is using a social security number not issued to him - with NO QUESTIONS ASKED. Why did the law enforcement spend all that time and money to investigate and catch one little guy in my town, while the whole darn country watches 3 Obamas get away with OPEN social security fraud and/or document fraud without consequence? Why go diligently after the gnat when everybody knows that 3 big whopping camels are going down the country’s throat?