Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thomas, Kagan asked to sit out health care case
AP Via OO ^ | AP

Posted on 11/26/2011 10:37:39 AM PST by Enosh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Enosh
Republican lawmakers recently have stepped up their effort against Kagan, complaining that the Justice Department has not fully revealed Kagan’s involvement in planning the response to challenges to the law. Kagan was Obama’s solicitor general, the administration’s top Supreme Court lawyer, until he nominated her to the high court last year.

Kagan was directly involved with supporting Obamacare. She mislead or lied to the lawmakers who approved her selection as a member of the Supreme Court.

Mr. Thomas has a spouse who works. He was NOT directly involved with the Obamacare issue. The Democrats are loud and boisterous over nothing, maybe to distract from the Kagan issue. She should resign in disgrace.

41 posted on 11/26/2011 2:16:38 PM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

I don’t see that they have a point at all about Thomas, they are simply saying that as a bona fide conservative justice and a strict constructionist it can be assumed that he will vote against Obama care. That is absolutely no reason to expect that he should excuse himself. In fact the matter is so unconstitutional that any justice who would even consider finding it constitutional should resign. Of course that applies to the bulk of federal law as it exists. If we actually went BACK to the constitution most of the federal government would have to be shut down.


42 posted on 11/26/2011 2:56:49 PM PST by RipSawyer (This does not end well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

First you would have to agree on definitions for every word in the constitution! Too many now believe that “make no law” means make all kinds of law, “shall not be infringed” means shall be infringed in every possible way, silence means consent, “promote the general welfare” means socialism, “a Republican form of government” means democracy, fascism, dictatorship or whatever etc. If the document had no more meaning than MOST Americans assign to it and I don’t mean just the left, I include many who call themselves strict conservatives, there would have been no reason to write it, let alone struggle for months and haggle over every word. A simple, “Do what you wish, after all the blood, sweat, tears and agony of a revolution we have no energy left to worry about setting down rules for the future”, would have sufficed.


43 posted on 11/26/2011 3:15:21 PM PST by RipSawyer (This does not end well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Kagan yes, Thomas no,


44 posted on 11/26/2011 3:32:30 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson