[napscoordinator]

Neither will. Perhaps they should but they won’t.

[Enosh]

It is a bit like a teenage girl throwing the kitchen sink worth of arguments in order to get her way, leaving the rest of us wondering what the hell she just said.

[WXRGina]

Neither will. Perhaps they should but they won’t.

Kagan is the only one of the two with an actual conflict of interests. Justice Thomas has no conflict whatsoever.

[Siena Dreaming]

No, Thomas' wife should not.

The only reason they made her an issue is because they knew there were grounds for Kagan's recusal so they made something up for our side to make it sound like is it a case of moral equivalancy.

It's not.

[GeronL]

The MSM will go after Thomas. The MSM won’t see any conflict for Kagan even if she wrote the thing. lol

[pieceofthepuzzle]

“Neither will. Perhaps they should but they won’t.”

Thomas has absolutely no direct conflict of interest. It doesn't matter what his wife does. She's a private citizen, and as long as he isn't financially conflicted he has no reason to recuse himself.

Kagan, on the other hand, has a direct conflict of interest. She was part of the inception of this plan and has a personal stake in it. She should definitely be recused. The two situations are not equivalent.

[goat granny]

Kagan yes, Thomas no,