Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
If you actually read the mans words instead of newtie spin if would help you look a bit smarter.
49 posted on 11/27/2011 7:19:50 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: org.whodat
“The way I would deal with those that are already here, which has been my stated position: empower the states to deal with the illegals that are already here, not some, big, grandiose, national one size fit-all."

Pretty hard to misunderstand that.

A piece-meal approach to the invasion of our country isn't constitutional, and it isn't workable. It's a loony idea, frankly.

And, by the way, the states already have the legitimate power to protect themselves if the general government will not do so, as the Constitution requires. The right to self-defense is intrinsic.

In the case of invasion, the Constitution explicitly acknowledges that.

"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." - Article I, Section 8.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact. Never was, never will be.

78 posted on 11/27/2011 7:32:45 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson