Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret Planned Parenthood Memo: Stop Maternity Coverage
LifeNews.com ^ | November 28, 2011 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 11/28/2011 8:01:45 AM PST by julieee

Secret Planned Parenthood Memo: Stop Maternity Coverage

Since becoming pregnant, I have learned a hard reality. I have private insurance because I am self employed. I knew that my insurance plan did not offer maternity coverage.

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/11/28/secret-planned-parenthood-memo-stop-maternity-coverage/

(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: maternity; memo; obama; plannedparenthood

1 posted on 11/28/2011 8:01:51 AM PST by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee

To Life News: He is not the commander in chief of our country. He’s commander in chief of the armed forces.

It might be a good article for you to cover Obama’s gift of hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to an organization in Kenya that seeks to liberalize the abortion laws there. This is totally illegal.


2 posted on 11/28/2011 8:10:13 AM PST by firebrand (It's almost too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee
I'm dubious. Didn't get past the following statement....

I was told this, ” When Obama enacted his “health care reform,” he mandated that maternity coverage not be available to any private insurance company.”

I just re-upped our private insurance. Would be no problem to get maternity coverage, in my state, through my insurer.

Now, I will allow that it's more expensive than a "Non-Maternity Coverage" Policy. But getting it would be pretty darn easy.

IMHO, there's plenty wrong with Obamacare. However, the best way to fight it is with facts, not demagoguery. All of the facts in the world go out the window if opponents can point to one lie.

3 posted on 11/28/2011 8:14:59 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

I find this nugget to be far more interesting from this article:

‘’When I worked at Planned Parenthood, there was something that we were not allowed to talk about. If we didn’t talk about it, then maybe no one else would either. It was called the Jaffe Memo. In 1969, Planned Parenthood was asked by the government to produce some ideas to help with overpopulation. They did just that. What is in the memo as a “solution” to overpopulation is astonishing.’’


4 posted on 11/28/2011 8:16:15 AM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Mid 20th century - maternity (pre-natal, delivery & hospitalization) expenses were not included in private or group health insurance policies.

BECAUSE -Conception and childbirth were not considered illnesses or accidents.

When finally added to coverage, (beginning with pregnancy complications, miscarriage and septicemia) - pregnancy was still subject to pre-existing exclusions.

To eliminate maternity coverage after the insurable risk has been evaluated and included for decades - is clearly manipulative and political. This is confiscation of private enterprise and competition by the insurance carriers.


5 posted on 11/28/2011 8:18:11 AM PST by sodpoodle ( Gingrich-Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Insurance coverage guarantees the cost of item covered will continuously rise. There are two forms of medical treatments which have consistently become better and more affordable. One is Lasik surgery and the other is cosmetic surgery. This is because they are not covered by “insurance.”

Insurance is socialist wealth redistribution. My guess is that if we simply did away with all forms of socialist “insurance” that the cost of medical care would be reasonable to everyone.

The abortion rate in Russia, where “family planning” has been practiced since the 1917 revolution is 6 abortions per woman during her fertile life. This is apparently because abortions are free but contraception and pregnancy cost money.


6 posted on 11/28/2011 8:18:33 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Eliminate Planned Parenthood and International Planned Parenthood. DEFUND socialist collectives, foreign and domestic.


7 posted on 11/28/2011 8:23:52 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

It’s interesting that maternity coverage and leave and other benefits related to maternity were pioneered by feminists who sought to level the playing field in the workplace. Now conservatives are the ones trying to uphold them, in the teeth of the Obama depopulation campaign.


8 posted on 11/28/2011 8:29:52 AM PST by firebrand (It's almost too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: julieee

The organization title is a fraud!

They are only interested in ABORTION, and NO PARENTHOOD.


9 posted on 11/28/2011 8:36:46 AM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

Maternity in the 1960’s. Before maternity coverage:

Physician pre-natal and delivery: $75
Maternity hospital 3 days all inclusive: $125
1960 VW $2000

Maternity in 2011.
Physician pre-natal and delivery: $7,000
Hospital: $13,000

Cost of new car $20,000


10 posted on 11/28/2011 8:52:44 AM PST by sodpoodle ( Gingrich-Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: julieee

It’s not true that private insurance won’t give maternity coverage.

And Life News would do better to show a photographic reproduction of the 1969 memo, than to retype it.


11 posted on 11/28/2011 9:11:34 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

I haven’t been following closely, but I believe you can now get coverage for the infant before he or she is born. I was socked with 8 days of hospital care for the baby.


12 posted on 11/28/2011 10:04:22 AM PST by firebrand (It's almost too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing

The 70’s was the big push for reducing “over-Population”

If fact One of Zero’s Czars was the main spokesperson for the movement.

It helped make abortion and euthanasia “acceptable” to society as a whole. Who would have thought back then that this bunch would actually be running the U.S Government one day. More like a nightmare come true.


13 posted on 11/28/2011 10:38:59 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson