To: TSgt
"They're paying these workers a lot more than they're paying their employees," Nelson said. "It's kind of sad."
Actually, that's utterly false, and this Nelson is either an utter idiot, or a liar to make this statement. If you want to compare costs, you have to take into account all costs incurred, or which Cooper Tire is obligated to incur; when that is done, it becomes painfully obvious that the temporary workers - for whom Cooper Tire is not obligated to provide all sorts of expensive, uneconomic benefits - are substantially cheaper than the union parasites they've just evicted.
4 posted on
11/29/2011 4:29:44 AM PST by
Oceander
(TINSTAAFL - Mother Nature Abhors a Free Lunch almost as much as She Abhors a Vacuum)
To: Oceander
—it becomes painfully obvious that the temporary workers - for whom Cooper Tire is not obligated to provide all sorts of expensive, uneconomic benefits - are substantially cheaper than the union parasites they’ve just evicted.—
This.
I’ve been in Information Technology since 1983. Twelve years of it as a contractor. I always made more contracting, but I was paid a strict hourly rate. And the full billing rate was the same or less than the employees cost “per hour”. In one case I made, in hourly wages, more than three times what the employees were making in raw hourly wages.
34 posted on
11/29/2011 6:19:13 AM PST by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson