Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Posted on 11/29/2011 9:28:12 AM PST by servo1969
When teenagers reveal that they had sexual experiences before age 13, shouldn't every effort be made to find out something about their sex partners?
That concern is missing from recent reports about the "risky behavior" of teens who call themselves homosexual, where these students report much higher pre-teen sexual experience than their heterosexual peers.
--
What is curious is our culture's mixed messages about early child sex and who the "partner" of that child is. The party line for years to kids in middle school or in "gay" materials pushed on teens has been promotion of early sex while providing either fuzzy or improper guidance about the age of the sex partner. Kids are supposed to be "empowered" now to choose to have sex starting around, oh, age 12. And if it's with someone older, isn't that their business?
Not all people who are involved in homosexuality, nor all progressives, think that this is okay. Problem is, plenty of these age boundary-smashers do populate advocacy groups, schools, influential teachers' unions, and youth counseling. Through serial neglect, obfuscation, and deceit, leftists have given youth a culture that is confused about child-adult sex.
There's even a line of thought among some homosexual advocates that says that young guys need to rethink those first fumblings initiated by the coach, the uncle, the family friend down the street. The boy isn't necessarily a victim, and it wasn't really criminal -- it might have been the boy's first "gay" encounter.
Revisionist history -- it works every time.
These messages to kids are quite common in homosexual literature. I remember how outraged I was when I first read Queer 13: Lesbian and Gay Writers Recall Seventh Grade.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
This data was retrieved from those school districts where students are permitted to declare their "sexual orientation" -- inappropriate enough. But why didn't the adult surveyors ask the elephant-in-the-room follow-up: "How old was/were your partner(s)?"
In the real, parenting, non-gay activism world, we would be asking, "Who victimized you?"
-----------
Myself and others have posted about this very subject a few times here on FR recently.
What Could End Rush Limbaugh's Career?
Why 12? Why not 10? Why not 8? And if the child can experience some sort of enjoyment with an age-contemporary (or alone), why not with someone older? Who are you to judge?
Not all people who are involved in homosexuality, nor all progressives, think that this is okay.
If they don't, it's because they haven't thought at all. As pointed out above, once the sexual free-for-all begins, there are no logical limits other than disapproving violent physical coercion.
“much more likely to report pre-teen sex, four times more likely than their heterosexual peers”
And yet somehow they never follow such facts where they lead: same-sex attraction disorder is precipitated by the trauma of pre-adult molestation or seduction.
The more access sodomites have to kids, the more kids are going to develop this disorder.
It’s funny that people are so willing to accept that girls are emotionally damaged by molestation or too-early seduction by older predators, while denying that a boy suffers no ill effects from anal rape.
Discriminating against sodomites is the only way to protect kids from them, and is therefore an inescapable moral duty.
As I have stated numerous times the raping of young boys by male homosexuals is all part of the lifestyle. Been rampant for decades in the Bay Area and ignored by the press in said area.
As unbelievable as it is, Kevin Jennings was the “Safe Schools Czar” for a year.
Obama’s safe schools czar, Kevin Jennings, admitted that when he was a high school administrator an underage male teenage student confided to him that he was being repeatedly molested by an adult male. Jenning’s response was to caution the youth to be sure he used a condom. This is Obama world.
“the raping of young boys by male homosexuals is all part of the lifestyle”
This is true.
I worked with many homosexual men during my 10 years in the restaurant business. After closing time when we were all cleaning,counting money and enjoying our happy hour, many of the gay men,after a few drinks, would give explicit stories about how they were sodomized in their youth by much older men.
These older men would seductively lure naive youth into their lifestyle with promises of money,drugs or most often, the promise of being a parental figure. After luring these into the gay lifestyle and after having their way with the youths, these older men would toss the young aside like a piece of trash and would then troll for more fresh meat.
These young boys often grow into pedophiles themselves. Many enter into professions like education or non profits in order find young boys for themselves and the cycle continues.
The REAL gay community is VERY secretive, are mostly pedophiles and are often pillars of the community-—Sandusky or Bernie Fine are examples.
They lure young boys into their gay bars, hang out around public toilets, cruise the streets late at night looking for tipsy boys, etc.
Don’t forget the Duke Universtity homosexual professor who was caught pimping out his adopted son.
Homosexuals can’t reproduce, they can only recruit.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Actually, homosexual men can reproduce just as heterosexual men do - by having sex with women - and homosexual women can reproduce by having sex with a man or artificial insemination.
However, that just reproduces a human being, not (in the absence of other factors) a homosexual.
Every Homosexual is a latent pedophile.
Yeah I know, get on my back and call me wrong.
There isn’t a fruit in theland who doesn’t want a kid. If they say they don’t they are lying.
No wonder they die in their early forties. They get a head start.
Let's be honest here, if we follow the statistics, it demonstrates a shockingly low fertility rate for American teens. If teens will lie as to the type of sexual interactions, what protections are or aren't used, etc, it stands to reason that there are more errors in the data. A FYI, a quick survey of my workplace has all but one who admits to lying on the Teen Risk surveys, going back over 35 years. I'd actually say that this is probably the most useless dataset ever created by the government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.