agreed. Something about its source being just “email” bothers me.
and then this...
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii, double citizenship, natural born...and others.
...that would be great if true, but its been so long since someone made that claim and nothing to show from it yet.
And this....
when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment
...THAT was January 2010, so this email was written in the 2nd half in 2010. It is at least a year old
It looks like the SCOTUS has no urgency to smack down Obama on anything. Sorry. This looks like a very old email swirling around the internet.
Moderator - does a one year old email count as FRONT PAGE news?
I understand that while and after reading, then reflecting on the contents of this email of Mr. Hennessy that the happenings reflected upon have happened and are true.
Editorializing on whether or not Justice Roberts intends to act on these ethical and criminal acts by this administration is license that many, if not all, editorials have in common.
There is nothing 'naked' about email postings unless they are in the eye of a few beholders. I have indicated links to follow for part of these, but to refer to them all would be meaningless, especially to readers like yourself.
This administration is, and should be, in great legal difficulty that if action would indeed be taken would put these miscreants in prison. Whether or not this occurs does indeed remain to be seen.