Posted on 11/30/2011 10:51:57 AM PST by ShadowAce
I have a regular cell phone connected by bluetooth in my car and that’s it.
If they were up front about what they track, and people didn't mind, that's fine. People like some on this thread who say they have nothing to hide will just accept that someone out there has every text, call and payment they make. But it should be disclosed to people so they can decide for themselves. Otherwise, it is a constitutional violation if collected by the government, and a civil invasion of privacy if done by a commercial entity.
I'd be fine with a huge suit against the companies involved in this.
You imply the fed gov is pushing the comms companies for this, but then you want to sue the companies?
Why not sue the fed gov? Why kill companies?
If the fed gov is pushing them, suing them will do no good.
No, you are the only one. And now we know who you are and how to find you.
jk
No cell phone except for emergencies while travelling. Not a smart phone, whatever they are.
here is there number, I called to ask if there software was on my phone, she said she would have someone call me back, here is the phone number if you wish to do the same;
CARRIER IQ, Inc.
1200 Villa Street, Suite 200
Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Phone: +1 650 625 5400
You are right, if the government is the problem, then I would sympathize with the companies, and they might have a defense. Only a lawsuit would allow such information to come to light, though. If they are doing this on their own, they are in big trouble. A lawsuit against the feds would not be likely to succeed. You need civil discovery to get the facts out first.
how does one block or remove it?
(people please save the smart alec remarks)
passing it along fyi
I would have to include myself because, even though I have a cell phone, it’s a Motorola and very, very old (e.g., has a pull-out antenna). A guy at the car wash saw me using it and laughed like a loon.
In two years I am dumping mine for a land line. I am tired of cell phones.
As long as the call quality stays the same or gets worse, I cant see me needing one too bad. The Motorola bag phones worked great but looked like a Samsonite carry on.
All the tin foil paranoia aside, I just hate the damn things. Very low quality pieces of equipment, why aren’t they waterproof by now? I need insurance for the thing? All the folks that live on the things have been turned into the rudest people I know.
Is anyone that doesn’t cary one or use it very little under the age of 45? .....40?
“As long as the call quality stays the same or gets worse, I cant see me needing one too bad.”
Same here, the quality is horrible. I sometimes borrow my mom’s when I’ve let the house phone go dead. Besides poor sound [an echo down in a drum sound] if I have to stay on it for any length of time, it burns my ear. And it’s supposed to be one of the best.
University town. Driving through the city I sometimes play a game with myself (no, not pocket billiards) betting myself $5 for each young woman I see walking who’s not as I pass her leashed to a cellphone. I seldom lose.
It would probably be more of a game to count the ones who don’t have phones.
But I’ve done that myself and it’s a pretty good mix of men, women, lots of teens around here. They seem oblivious to everything around them.
Most of my FReeping is done on a smartphone.
I don't use mine. After knowing-for-sure, when I was a kid, that someday, we would all be able to have portable phones that we could carry in our pockets, it came true!
Now, I always forget to pick the damned thing up and take it with me when I leave the house ................................. FRegards
No Such Agency ;)
Ft. Meade, MD and San Antonio, TX
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.