>> “Newt isn’t perfect but he is an acceptable alternative to Robomney.” <<
Bullshit!
We need the alternative to both of them.
Neither of them can beat Obama because both of them are public healthcare, and mandate promotors. That takes away our biggest issue.
So much anger...really? C’mon...what’s with the namecalling and poor research? Several people have asked you to provide documentation for your statements, and I for one would also be willing to read and consider these items based on what you provide. However, as we all know, when we resort to name calling and anger we really don’t have the material to back up our statements. Is this true for you or are you holding back on us and have material to share? Seriously, for the sake of the discussion put it out there.
I’ve been watching the debates since the beginning and have watched several interviews. Newt is answering questions in regards to these past policy poistions he had in the past. This is a time for conservatives to vet these candidates, but we have to be honest about our own vetting process. I think that is what people are asking you to do...be honest and provide documentation for your statements of “fact.”