[floridarunner01]

I agree with Rush. Everyone is claiming that only their candidate can beat Obama. And that’s just not the truth. Any of them CAN win.

And none of them are perfect. We are electing a human being here. Not a God. They’ve all made gaffes. They have all made mistakes. If one mistake disqualifies them, you will drive yourself mad and find yourself struggling to find anyone to support.

[Sans-Culotte]

I agree with Rush. Everyone is claiming that only their candidate can beat Obama. And that’s just not the truth. Any of them CAN win.

Rush has also pointed out that the 'rats understand incrementalism. They will take whatever/whomever they can get to advance their agenda. For the Republicans, it is becoming "Reagan or nothing".

[Rational Thought]

With apologies to you and Rush, I just don't find logic in the argument. Does this mean I should vote for anyone against Obama? Does this mean I should support a candidate who is (or has been) supportive of Obamacare, abortion, bigger government or amnesty? These are all issues which Hillary Clinton supports. If she were running against Obama, should I then be voting for her?

I don't buy the line that Ronald Reagan couldn't get elected today. Reagan wasn't perfect, but he was one who articulated and (mostly) upheld Conservative values. Unfortunately, the two leading Republican candidates right now are not exactly poster boys for Conservatism.

I only know one thing for sure. I won't vote for Obama. As for an opponent to support, I hope things don't proceed as indicated. Otherwise, many of us will be facing a huge dilemma.

[dfwgator]

The others aren’t perfect, but Romney is a socialist. NEVER ROMNEY!