Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigDaddyTX

In response to number 4: If the work is copied or plagiarized, how does one reassess the work to determine actual level of achievement? The achievement is not the students. The achievement belongs to someone else, does it not?


2 posted on 12/01/2011 5:30:25 PM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goodwithagun

Re-do’s and don’t count zero’s...

From: Marzano Teleconference October 9, 2009 David Yanoski
http://asdsbar.wikispaces.com/

“Zeros on assignments: If you give a zero on an assignment because the student did not do it, then it generates inaccurate data. This process is intended to measure student learning. When a zero is given for a missed assignment, the zero is not assessing “learning.” Assess responsibility in a different way – life skills, work habits. Don’t penalize kids by giving the zeros for not doing their work.”


4 posted on 12/01/2011 5:43:36 PM PST by BigDaddyTX (Don't Mex with Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: goodwithagun; GeronL
re: #4: it says "4) Don't punish academic dishonesty with reduced grades; apply other consequences and reassess to determine actual level of achievement".

Meaning, apply consequences for the dishonesty, and then MAKE HIM DO THE WORK OVER, or do another assignment of comparable difficulty, (supervised to ensure he gets no outside help) to see how HIS work is.

9 posted on 12/02/2011 9:06:29 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson