Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top 5 Aerial Weapons That Could Change the Future of Warfare
The Blaze ^ | 12/2/11 | Buck Sexton

Posted on 12/02/2011 10:47:05 AM PST by Nachum

Here are the top five aerial weapons that one day could change the face of modern warfare. Relying on the most advanced technology in the world, these hyper-advanced projectiles may outmaneuver, outrun, and outmatch America’s foes around the globe, whenever the need arises.

1) The Mach-5 Cruise Missile

If a cruise-missile at supersonic speed is a full-throttle Ford Mustang, then a missile that hits Mach 5 is a Formula 1 racer going all out.

The problem is, that hypersonic Mach 5 pace — clocking in at five times the speed of sound– has yet to be reached by munitions. Until now.

The X-51 missile can hit hypersonic speed, and moves so fast that it doesn’t even need an explosive warhead. It’s kinetic energy will shred through targets.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerial; arfare; boeing; hypersonic; scramjet; weapons; x51
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2011 10:47:08 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Seems if it goes that fast, then all the target has to do is cut power as soon as it senses the approach, and the missile will probably overshoot. Power cut would be near instantaneous. I doubt anything that fast can make a very tight turn.


2 posted on 12/02/2011 10:52:03 AM PST by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
I doubt anything that fast can make a very tight turn.

Filed under "famous last words."

3 posted on 12/02/2011 10:57:33 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Newt Gingrich: The go-to guy for a party that is determined to waste yet another decade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
3) “Hyper Speed Bunker Buster”

Ah, another WWII idea. There was the "Disney bomb", a rocket assisted munition designed, iirc, for the U-boat pens.

Accuracy being what it was in those days...it wasn't all that big of a success.

4 posted on 12/02/2011 11:00:19 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Seems like, at that speed, wouldn’t matter if the target ‘cuts power’. As you mentioned, the weapon is moving so fast that it is doubtful it would even have time to ‘change course’ enough to miss the target.


5 posted on 12/02/2011 11:03:24 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Aw, they forgot the Firefox. Then again....not everyone can think in Russian. I always wondered how a Mach 5 fighter was able to fire cannons in a dogfight. Silly Hollywood.


6 posted on 12/02/2011 11:05:22 AM PST by edpc (Wilby 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I’m sure that variable is included in the testing.


7 posted on 12/02/2011 11:11:42 AM PST by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Rods from God. Imagine if a country had a robotic space plane that could maneuver in orbit for months at a time, and enough payload capacity to hold several dozen (guess) Tungsten rods.


8 posted on 12/02/2011 11:19:13 AM PST by Jack of all Trades (Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

A magpie with a machine gun.


9 posted on 12/02/2011 11:33:26 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

That is assuming the target is moving in the first place.

At 5x (3500mph) the closing speed would be so fast if it was a vehicle it would need some good brakes, a ship couldn’t alter course fast enough.


10 posted on 12/02/2011 11:37:57 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

True, I was thinking about another missile or aircraft.


11 posted on 12/02/2011 11:52:42 AM PST by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

google losat videos and watch what happens as losats close in on moving targets.


12 posted on 12/02/2011 11:54:21 AM PST by from occupied ga (your own government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

A grouse with a grenade.
“Look at the grouse! Look at the grouse!”


13 posted on 12/02/2011 11:55:02 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

Barnes Wallis

Genius!

“Grand Slam bomb”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-Mm-zFW_nA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_bomb


14 posted on 12/02/2011 12:04:18 PM PST by BwanaNdege (“Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address” - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Do you suppose the Senate wants us to have preemptive stuff that really works?

No!

They’re afraid we’d use it....and then we’d be “arrogant”......


15 posted on 12/02/2011 12:04:48 PM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack of all Trades
I think you're right on here. Aircraft(probably UAVs) skimming the upper atmosphere or stationary platforms with kinetic projectiles are coming, it's just a matter of time. From what I've read about this, a platform launching three or four 100kg rods from space will definitely ruin someone's day! Wonder what the actual blast/shock radius of that would be?
16 posted on 12/02/2011 12:13:27 PM PST by aegiscg47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Definitely good at ground or ocean targets. Is this aerial weapon a losat?


17 posted on 12/02/2011 12:14:40 PM PST by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The weapons that will change modern warfare already exist: Three lower-yield nuclear weapons, launched from merchant vessels near the coasts of the United States and detonated in the upper atmosphere would destroy the American economy and disrupt American society for generations.

Spending another cent on any defense R&D before hardening our electronic systems is preparing to fight the last (conventional) war instead of facing the real (terrorist/rogue state) enemy.

18 posted on 12/02/2011 12:19:11 PM PST by TonyInOhio (Ohio's four seasons: Rain, Snow, Rain & Snow, and Humid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack of all Trades

The X-37 is being kept in orbit longer than expected, and Iran keeps having mishaps at its weapons facilities.


19 posted on 12/02/2011 12:26:30 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

At Mach 5, 1 mile a second, I think you’re right.


20 posted on 12/02/2011 12:39:22 PM PST by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson