Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katiedidit1

I think the majority of us here are not totally thrilled with any candidate, but there’s a growing majority that recognizes that Newt more than anyone, has really thought through the issues facing this country.

On the other hand, there are people on this forum, most likely unemployed, who have nothing better to do than to post incessantly negative Newt articles and data collections.

These people are so closed minded to anything the man has to say, that it’s not worth trying to convince them.

THEREFORE, it’s been my opinion that the best thing for both candidates would be a Lincoln-Douglas style debate, at some point, that pits them against each other to discuss the issues and how they see America. It doesn’t have to be negative at all.

I’m disappointed that Romney has refused.


52 posted on 12/02/2011 12:30:34 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: nikos1121

The debate between the two front runners would have served as an eye opener to voters that are undecided. If Romney wants his views heard and the differences between himself and Newt aired..why not seize the opportunity?
and I agree with you...the gop slate could have been a lot better but I am dealing with the choices we do have and imo...Newt is the man.
Very dissapointed in Romney’s refusal.


69 posted on 12/02/2011 1:11:04 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson