Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notwithstanding

lol, why did you leave off Bachmann? Hopefully is was just a slight oversight because she has a 100% lifetime rating.

http://www.conservative.org/ratings/2008house.htm

If this posts more than once, sorry. Can’t tell what’s posting and what’s not based on the Service Error message.


23 posted on 12/04/2011 3:28:38 PM PST by parksstp (Articulate Conservatives look for Converts. RINO's look for Democrat Heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: parksstp

I used the last year Newt, Paul and Santorum were all serving, which was 1998. It is more apples to apples that way and it undercuts the lies that Newt is not as conservative as the other two.

I like Bachmann as a spokesmodel for conservatism, but she is not presidential timber - and her resume does not indicate she has ever led a significant organization.


27 posted on 12/04/2011 3:54:26 PM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: parksstp

I used the last year Newt, Paul and Santorum were all serving, which was 1998. It is more apples to apples that way and it undercuts the lies that Newt is not as conservative as the other two.

I like Bachmann as a spokesmodel for conservatism, but she is not presidential timber - and her resume does not indicate she has ever led a significant organization.


32 posted on 12/04/2011 4:02:09 PM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson