Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 12/02/2011 3:10:24 PM PST by Clive
As environmental activists fly to Durban, South Africa to attack Canada’s climate change position at the UN climate change talks, I can’t stand idly by while false allegations continue to be made about one of Canada’s most innovative and important industries: The oil sands.
Canadian oil is no “dirtier” than any other oil.
When the full life-cycle is calculated, oil from the Canadian oil sands emits between 18 percent higher and 8 percent lower greenhouse gases compared to other sources of crude oil.
I strongly favour reducing our dependence on fossil fuels by adopting technologies that use less of them.
But I find a degree of hypocrisy among activists who paint oil companies as environmental criminals while many of these same critics go about driving, flying, and otherwise enjoying the benefits of living in a society that depends on oil for over one-third of its energy.
Greenpeace takes an aerial picture of a Canadian oil sands mining operation and suggests this is the way it will look — forever. It fails to tell the public the mine is a temporary disturbance and — by law — oil sands companies are required to return the site to a thriving ecosystem, with native trees and shrubs and lakes.
I’ve travelled to some of these restored sites and they’re beautiful.
In some areas the oil lies well below the surface and here the oil sands industry is using in situ (in place) drilling.
By injecting steam to release the oil from the sand, it can be extracted with minimal disturbance to the surface environment.
Canadian oil producers must meet some of the toughest environmental and social standards on the planet.
Compared to the six largest oil exporters (Nigeria, Kuwait, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Russia and Saudi Arabia), Canada is far ahead on leading social and environmental indicators:
Anti-oil sands activist groups like Greenpeace, which I helped found, live in a dream world where they hope to replace fossil fuels, nuclear and hydro energy — by far the majority of the world’s energy supply — with unreliable, intermittent and expensive wind and solar power.
The world needs oil now and we’ll need it for the foreseeable future — so it matters greatly where that oil comes from.
If any oil is to be labeled “dirty”, shouldn’t it be the oil coming from dictatorial regimes in Russia and the Middle East, rather than friendly and democratic Canada?
— Dr. Moore, Chair of Greenspirit Strategies Ltd., was a co-founder of Greenpeace. His new book, Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist is available at Amazon.ca
-
-
I wonder if these same Greenpeace activists have a problem with the fact that much of their funding comes from Saudia Arabia?
an this is news?
This article makes good points about the origins of oil.
Saudi oil is “dirtier” than US or Canadian oil because of the regime.
Gotta hate those forests! Damn oil men, growing trees everywhere! Who do they think they are?
"Gateway Hill is the first restored area in the oil sands to receive reclamation certification by the Alberta Government."
;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.