I’m sick of this “no executive experience” notion, used against Cain before he dropped out, now against Bachmann.
Obama didn’t have any either, and he was able to get elected. So that proves its not a deal breaker.
And by the way, neither does the KNOWN adulterer, excuse me I mean Newt. Remember, he was “just a Representative” too. Granted, the Speaker of the House, but that’s not technically speaking “executive experience”.
Besides, again, I thought we here on FR, and in the TEA party movement were all about being OUTside the beltway? I guess when the full implications of that nice little platitude smack us in reality, we fold like a house of cards.
It’s just as I predicted long ago, it’s all coming to fruition: the TEA party movement, just like all other politically/human based “movements” is failing to live up to its states goals and objectives NOT because the goals were in any way WRONG, but because they ultimately are not the answer to what (or really Who) every man seeks. But I digress.
Newt is no better. I’m not supporting him. It’s Bachmann at this point, or bust.
Yes he got elected but his lack of executive experience shows because he let’s everyone else do what he’s supposed to (not talking about his disastrous ideas here, just his ability to run the country). My country hangs in the balance. Cain was an outsider with executive experience, the perfect combo for me.
Cindie