BUT, what he is talking about is the fact that many fertilized eggs never implant themselves and thus never become viable foetus. Further, many implanted fertilized eggs spontaneously abort.
Are then these "unsuccessful" fertilized eggs, as Neut calls them, not "living humans?" I would say that they are. Others, just as anti-abortion as I, would opine that they are not.
Why let ourselves be led into this scientific-theological-legal thicket? Neut is anti-abortion; Anti-public funding of abortion; Anti-stem cell research using material from aborted or artificially created foetus ... and that is enough for me to consider voting for him, at least on that issue.
However, if some snivelling Left-Wing MSM homo-marriage advocate attempts to lead him down the garden path, he ought to be smart enough to recognize the ploy for what it is and "Trump" his interrogator. The SOBs need a very firm slap up the side of the head.
Folks, as we already know, by letting the MSM lead the Republican Primaries, we are being sidetracked.
Newt is CATHOLIC. The Church has one position....."human life begins at conception"....implantation has precisely nothing to do with the concept of "being human" and deserving the protection of the law. Humans die at every possible stage after conception, some before implantation, some before birth, some shortly after birth, and some after a century or more of life. But they're ALL human, and terminating their existence AT ANY POINT is wrong.