Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carolyn826
If people are really going to refuse to vote for a candidate (and in turn, let Obama win, who is far, far, far, far, far worse on the issue) who has voted pro-life 99% of the time simply because of this, then there is little hope for this nation.

While it's one thing to disagree with Newt on this, there isn't any legislation, proposed or otherwise, that this particular detail will make one iota of difference on in how he votes on that legislation.

38 posted on 12/04/2011 4:02:08 PM PST by RockinRight (If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight
It's a little presumptuous to think that Gingrich will be the nominee. As of now, he hasn't won any primaries.

If this primary season has taught us anything it's that front-runners come and go. So far we've had as front-runners, Trump, Romney, Bachmann, Cain, Perry and Gingrich (did I leave anyone out?).

There's still plenty of time for Gingrich himself to talk voters out of supporting him.

79 posted on 12/04/2011 5:24:34 PM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson