Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.F. LEGISLATION - Where windbags dare to outlaw plastic bags
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 12/4/11 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 12/04/2011 5:38:44 PM PST by SmithL

On his official website, San Francisco Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi starts his list of accomplishments with this item: "Plastic Bag Ban: First-in-the-Nation ban on plastic bags in chain grocery stores and drug stores, which sparked similar legislation around the world from Oakland to Canada to Paris to Beijing." In his final month as supervisor before he becomes sheriff, Mirkarimi wants to expand the ban so that it applies to all stores and requires retailers to charge customers for bags at the checkout counter.

"First in the nation" is rarely a good thing for a law. First, it means the measure is probably San Francisco-style social engineering. Second, its target is virgin territory probably because there's been no need for a law. Third, the measure may cost someone else their job and surely will be paid out of your pocket.

Exhibit A: San Francisco's groundbreaking Happy Meal law. McDonald's got around the ordinance that banned free toys with meals that don't meet City Hall's nutritional standards by announcing it will charge customers an extra 10 cents if they want a toy with the food.

Exhibit B: The Mirkarimi plan. Supervisors will vote on Plastic Bag 2.0 this month. It comes with a mandatory charge of at least 10 cents per bag starting July 1, possibly rising to 25 cents in 2014. Retailers get to keep your dimes.

Mirkarimi told me that San Francisco no longer is in the lead when it comes to bag laws. Other governments - Ireland, Beijing, Marin County - that followed Ess Eff's lead are "now blowing by us. Their laws are much more vigorous."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: nannystate; plastic; sanfranciscovalues; yourtaxdollarsatwork

1 posted on 12/04/2011 5:38:55 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Was it not liberals who wanted these plastic bags in the first place to save trees?


2 posted on 12/04/2011 5:45:32 PM PST by vlad335
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Same in Portland. I snapped a picture of the bag ban because I didn’t think anyone would believe it. So I told the cashier I planned on burning my paper bags, ensuring we all have dirtier air and water. Not a clean burn either, one of those chunky charcoal puffs in the air burnings.


3 posted on 12/04/2011 5:47:45 PM PST by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Maybe customers should refuse to shop at stores that charge money for a plastic bag.


4 posted on 12/04/2011 5:48:08 PM PST by goldi (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldi
Maybe customers should refuse to shop at stores that charge money for a plastic bag.

The retailers do not want this crap. It's law made by missinformed fools who have the power to pass laws. Santa Cruz has done a similar thing... 'cept it's soon to be illegal to use plastic bags and it'll cost $$ to use paper. Go to any recycle center. You will find mountains of cardboard and perhaps one dumpster for plastic bags. It's insanity at best.
5 posted on 12/04/2011 6:06:04 PM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Read the comments on sfgate.
From one RalphSmith
“Once upon a time, there was a leftist Iranian-American supervisor named Ross Mirkarimi who went to an environmentalist convention in Brazil. One of the participants was the attractive Venezuelan telenovela B-star Eliana Lopez who swept Mirkarimi off his feet. They married and you know what they say, pay attention to whom the politician is married as many decisions and laws are going to be pioneered by the individual’s spouse.

This is the origin of this law, Eliana an environmental fanatic wants us not to use plastic bags.”

Looks like SF can thank some self righteous 3rd world soap opera “star” for the bag jihad. LOL.

6 posted on 12/04/2011 6:16:27 PM PST by Polynikes (Hakkaa Palle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
it takes SEVEN truckloads of paper bags to deliver the same amount of bags in ONE truckload of plastic bags...
7 posted on 12/04/2011 6:16:40 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots
I planned on burning my paper bags

If you weren't so far away, you could just pitch them on my tire fire.

8 posted on 12/04/2011 6:24:32 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country but I want a President who loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

My lib son who lives in Boston was whining that I burn files at our farm instead of putting them in the shredding bin at my office until I pointed out that the trucks that pick up the bins use fossil fuel as do the machines that shred the papers and that it all ends up in the landfill anyway whereas by a clean hot fire at my farm, out in the country, it’s gone in an hour with very little pollution.


9 posted on 12/04/2011 6:28:26 PM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: no one in particular

I’m as environmentally reckless as the next guy but I really like the cloth bags. They cost me 50¢ apiece and are practically indestructible.


10 posted on 12/04/2011 6:29:33 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country but I want a President who loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Thanks, Chode.

I’m reminded of a similar ‘discussion’ about 20 years ago in the Midwest. A poultry processor for whom I worked was approached about the use of foam egg cartons versus the former fiber board cartons. The argument was the the foam egg cartons were ‘evil’ because of 1) production cost, 2) use of precious ‘non renewable’ resources in production, and 3) exceedingly long decomposition times in landfills.
We went back to our supplier, and found that they were dealing with the same kinds of issues all across the country.
Their solution? The truth...
Cost to produce was less than 60% the cost of fiber board cartons, and the transportation was improved by a factor of five; ie, five times more foam cartons on a truck than the fiber board. That just left the landfill issue, and the supplier’s response to the ‘environmentalists’ was to offer to support their recycle efforts...which cut the cost of the foam carton by another 12% or so.


11 posted on 12/04/2011 6:32:11 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Do you wash your bags in hot water after every use?

Otherwise, according to the net, they’ll be covered in E. Coli very quickly.


12 posted on 12/04/2011 6:35:12 PM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM
i've never met a RAT yet that was a smart as they thought they were...
13 posted on 12/04/2011 6:35:38 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
like was posted, you ABSOLUTELY have to wash them to prevent contamination, and even if you do, most don't...
14 posted on 12/04/2011 6:39:57 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Windbags

Perfect

15 posted on 12/04/2011 7:00:18 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I am not a wacky environmentalist but if one don't believe that plastic, in particularly discarded plastic grocery bags, is not an environmental scourge then one might check out the link to view the impact on our oceans and the life there in.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch#Sources_of_pollutants

16 posted on 12/04/2011 7:48:19 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

How come he didn’t mention the Happy meal fiasco that got shoved up his butt.


17 posted on 12/04/2011 8:26:20 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Lol.. Good one! I think our strategy of creating dirtier air and water is most effective when spread out across the country. there is some appeal to a large fire, if the contaminants spread to our liberal friends.


18 posted on 12/05/2011 4:13:23 AM PST by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Folks if I read this article right, the retailers can charge for the bags and keep the money they get from the bags. This seems like a winner for the stores. Maybe the stores will do what McDonald’s did and donate the money to charity. Fat chance.


19 posted on 12/05/2011 12:58:53 PM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson