Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL
Look there are places in the U.S. where high speed rail would work:

1)The Boston-NY-DC Corridor

2)Dallas-Houston-San Antonio

3) Chicago-Mid West

4) Intra state Florida

The problem is the terrain has to be flat. That's why Vegas/LA is a non starter. The climb/descent into the LA basin is a killer.

Same thing for LA-North. Got to get out of the LA basin. But LA-San Diego would work and makes sense.

31 posted on 12/05/2011 10:14:36 PM PST by LVGuy600 (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LVGuy600
To be honest, I'm not so sure about one through four. It would really depend on how much demand there is, to begin with, and assume that its mutually beneficially for both sides......it might not be.

Boston and NYC, could wind up being a massive waste, or hurting one at the expense of the other, and while I believe that the locations you named are probably the best case scenarios, I'm not convinced its worth that kind of gamble to find out, especially since there hasn't been that kind of high demand airline and bus wise with NYC and Boston.

33 posted on 12/05/2011 11:31:47 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson