BP as in Blowout Preventor, thats where the failure took place. Had it worked as designed there would have been no spill ot leakage.
“BP as in Blowout Preventor, thats where the failure took place. Had it worked as designed there would have been no spill ot leakage.”
The above is an untrue statement.
I don’t think the blowout preventer was designed to withstand the torque of a million pounds of pipe falling over.
Remembering the concensus was the blowout preventor’s one working hydraulic ram tried to pinch a coupling which would not crush.
From reputations, Haliburton is way ahead of BP regading corner cutting. They are unlikely to be able to pin this on Haliburton.