Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PETA knocks W.H. over bestiality
Politico ^

Posted on 12/06/2011 2:37:33 PM PST by Sub-Driver

PETA knocks W.H. over bestiality By BYRON TAU | 12/06/11 5:04 PM

The White House press corps may have giggled – but one animal rights group thinks bestiality is no laughing matter.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) sent a letter objecting to the White House press secretary Jay Carney’s unserious treatment of a question about sex with animals in Monday’s briefing.

“In watching last night's news briefing, we were upset to note that you flippantly addressed the recently approved repeal of the military ban on bestiality,” the group wrote in the letter to Carney. “With respect, this is no laughing matter. Our office has been flooded with calls from Americans who are upset that this ban has been repealed—and for good reason. As we outlined in the attached letter sent yesterday to the secretary of defense, animal abuse does not affect animals only—it is also a matter of public safety, as people who abuse animals very often go on to abuse human beings.”

The question about bestiality came from WorldNetDaily reporter Lester Kinsolving – a longtime White House correspondent whose questions about homosexuality and sodomy have made him infamous. Kinsolving’s question concerned an accidental deletion in the Uniform Code of Military Justice that bans sex with animals. Carney declined to comment and told reporters, “Let’s get to something more serious.”

“Are you sure you don't want to take any more questions on bestiality?” amused reporters asked Carney after he declined to answer Kinsolving’s question.

But PETA says the legislative mistake leaves animals vulnerable and wants it fixed by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta or Congress. The group sent another letter to Panetta on Monday, requesting that he re-add a bestiality provision to military law.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bestiality; gay; gaymafia; goats; peta; ucmj; zoophilia
Now I've heard everything........
1 posted on 12/06/2011 2:37:36 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

PETA/Carney/Obama/goats...all really strange bedfellows.


2 posted on 12/06/2011 2:40:48 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Congress: Looting the future to bribe the present.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

One form of sexual depravity that liberals actually find repugnant. Who knew?!


3 posted on 12/06/2011 2:43:05 PM PST by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Homosexual activists have long known that they are the vanguard for the normalization of all sexual deviancy.


4 posted on 12/06/2011 2:45:31 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I'm surprised that the people at PETA who claim to be such animal lovers would be so upset about other people who just want to take their animal-loving to the next level. :=)
5 posted on 12/06/2011 2:45:31 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Funny-—you can violate human beings in icky, unnatural ways—that is ok—but violate animals which are not human and NOOOOOOOO.

Why don’t they protest against homosexuality which is so demeaning to human being’s dignity and creates disease and dysfunctional relationships and shorter life spans? Hmmmmmm.

No logic and reason and science used with the PETA crowd-—just EMOTION in that Marxist sense which destroys intellectual pursuit.


6 posted on 12/06/2011 2:45:54 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
PETA is not for the idea of animal sex? Jeez, I thought they wanted animals to have rights - including sex with humans.

Oh well back to my steak.

7 posted on 12/06/2011 2:46:40 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (Cain/West 2012....what would the RACISTS LIBERALS say???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
PETA is not for the idea of animal sex? Jeez, I thought they wanted animals to have rights - including sex with humans.

Oh well back to my steak.

8 posted on 12/06/2011 2:46:57 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (Cain/West 2012....what would the RACISTS LIBERALS say???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Kinsolving’s question concerned an accidental deletion in the Uniform Code of Military Justice that bans sex with animals.

There was nothing accidental about the deletion.

9 posted on 12/06/2011 2:54:39 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExCTCitizen

Finally something me and PETA can agree on... :P


10 posted on 12/06/2011 2:54:39 PM PST by Gasshog (going to get what all those libs asked for, but its not what they expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Yet I heard somewhere that PETA wants to reserve some of the .xxx domains when they become available, so as to intersperse images of animal abuse with borderline erotic images (because vegans don't appear very healthy, so are not very erotic). In other words, PETA does want to push bestiality.

This article explains it: "The site itself may have a tough time getting repeat business, however. Rajt said it would have pornographic content but that it would be interspersed with undercover photos and footage of animals being mistreated."

I guess the bestiality just has to be on PETA's terms.

11 posted on 12/06/2011 2:55:13 PM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama can ok eating the jackasses, but screwing them has got to be a problem. On the other hand, his new pandering to perverts policy might make PETA retract their position.


12 posted on 12/06/2011 2:59:53 PM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
filthy disease ridden queers having sex with men isn't all that much different than sex with animals except the animals don't like it...
13 posted on 12/06/2011 3:17:34 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

But, I thought Barack and Michelle were married.


14 posted on 12/06/2011 3:21:16 PM PST by moovova (Report my sarcastic, fear-mongering, hate-filled lies to www.AttackWatch.com by clicking HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Add that match up to the Liberal Special Interest Group Bowl Series:

Poochie Pumpers vs PETA in the PetSmart DoggieStyle Bowl, Jan 6, ESPN.

Other bowl games in the series:

Unions vs Environmentalists in the ‘Pave the Whales’ Bowl
Hollywood vs. Penn State in the ‘Every Boy Has Two Orifices Bowl
NEA vs. Planned Parenthood in the ‘Abort the Future’ Bowl
Gay Mafia vs. CAIR in the ‘Take My Bomb Like a Man’ Bowl
Fannie Mae vs Occupy Movement in the ‘Catch Me, Screw Me’ Bowl
NAACP vs. La Raza in the ‘Majority Minority Bowl’ (winner of this Bowl faces CAIR in the ‘Breeder Bowl’ - winner takes all!)
Climate Warriors vs. IAW in the ‘Junk Built in America’ Bowl (Buy American, whether it’s Junk Science, or Junk Cars, buy it here)
Wind Power Lobby vs. Sierra Club in the Chick-Fil-A Bowl (”Eat more bludgeoned Blue Herons”)

You could field a full slate of games for Conservatives to watch throughout December, and they’d be a damn site more entertaining than watching Temple and Wyoming go at it.


15 posted on 12/06/2011 3:27:47 PM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama’s been screwing the pooch for awhile.


16 posted on 12/06/2011 4:07:47 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The bestiality rule was reversed by Omoslem to please Muslims in the military.

Before anybody accuses me of slander or (gasp!) hate, please consider that the “holy” koran instructs muslims:

“You can have sex with animals, but you must sell the meat to a different village.”

That’s their version of ‘Emily Post.’ Proper etiquette.

I’m not making this up.


17 posted on 12/06/2011 4:36:02 PM PST by LyinLibs (All moslems are somewhere on the killing-you spectrum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LyinLibs

source?


18 posted on 12/07/2011 3:19:58 PM PST by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson