Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reporter asks Carney: Does Obama ‘Approve or Disapprove of Bestiality in Our Armed Forces?’
The Blaze ^ | 12-06-11 | Tiffany Gabbay

Posted on 12/06/2011 5:39:15 PM PST by Lazlo in PA

Here‘s a line of questioning you don’t hear everyday, let alone it being asked of a White House Press Secretary in reference to the Commander in Chief.

During what otherwise would have been a typical White House press briefing Monday, Jay Carney fielded a real curve ball from World Net Daily reporter Lester Kinsolving, a man known for asking outlandish questions. The topic? Whether President Obama approves of bestiality in the military.

Kinsolving was referring to a recent Senate vote repealing sodomy and bestiality bans in the military.

The odd, if not uproarious exchange went something like this:

KINSOLVING: The Family Research Council and CNS News both reported a 93-to-7 U.S. Senate vote to approve a defense authorization bill that, quote, “includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, but also repeals the military ban on sex with animals, or bestiality.” Does the commander-in-chief approve or disapprove of bestiality in our armed forces?

CARNEY: I don’t have any comment on–I don’t have any comment on that. Let me go to another question.

KINSOLVING: Does the President believe this will be approved by all animal support groups, such as –

CARNEY: Let’s get to something more serious.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bestiality; carney; gayagenda; homosexualagenda; humananimalsex; peta; worldnetdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Letter to my senator: (BTW, one of them is Senator Webb and it was a given that he would favor bestiality) ~ so

saw that you voted the other evening to rescind prohibitions on bestiality (sex with animals) in the UCMJ?

So ~ do you have preferences? Horses, sheep?

Maybe you'd like to start telling the voters about this.

i mean like this was just out of the blue!!!

Almost like finding you guys voting to declare the Moon Purple Cheese rather than Green Cheese, or to replace the Eagle with a pig or something

Really just such a surprise

Does your wife know about this change in orientation?

61 posted on 12/06/2011 7:46:46 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
The SEVEN Senator who voted "NO" (unbelievable....that's all who voted no):

Question: On Passage of the Bill (S. 1867 As Amended ) Vote Number: 218 Vote Date: December 1, 2011, 08:02 PM

. . .

Vote Counts: YEAs 93
NAYs 7

Coburn (R-OK)
Harkin (D-IA)
Lee (R-UT)
Merkley (D-OR)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Wyden (D-OR)

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00218

62 posted on 12/06/2011 7:49:17 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LyinLibs

Isn’t there a provision that says that the human/animal sex has to be with an opposite sex animal? That’s OK, but having sex with an animal of the same gender is “forbidden”. If you’re having sex WITH AN ANIMAL what difference does it make what the gender of the ANIMAL is? What a world.


63 posted on 12/06/2011 7:50:54 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

Knew it was Les before I read the article.


64 posted on 12/06/2011 7:57:11 PM PST by Stentor ("All cults of personality start out as high drama and end up as low comedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: boop

But what about worms or some bivalves who are both male and female?


65 posted on 12/06/2011 8:04:51 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: central_va

66 posted on 12/06/2011 8:11:23 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You need to make your point.


67 posted on 12/06/2011 8:12:51 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

What happens between a beard and her beau is permitted as long as there is no crying afterwards by either party.


68 posted on 12/06/2011 8:23:35 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: stormer
That said, the White House press corp needs one less member - pull this bullshit outfit's credentials.

Let me get this straight - you want to pull the credentials of the only guy in the White House press corps who actually challenges Carney on legitimate issues that almost every other reporter in the White House press corps purposefully ignores?

69 posted on 12/06/2011 8:23:50 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

That there is hilarious. I dont care who ya are.

Laughing like a fool and good thing I wasn’t drinking anything at the time , otherwise it would be spewed all over the puter ~


70 posted on 12/06/2011 8:32:20 PM PST by simplesimon (You are entitled to your own opinions but not your own "facts"...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor

Of course, we have our connoisseurs of gay, S&M dominatrix bestiality over there in Enumclaw, WA.


71 posted on 12/06/2011 8:41:23 PM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: simplesimon

Kinda like a Michilin Man blimp.
I could almost see the waddle, feel the ground shake.


72 posted on 12/06/2011 8:56:10 PM PST by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux

Yup. And I heard of a guy about 30 years ago in that same general area abusing a St Bernard... sort of. The dog was on top, and the cops couldn’t tell if the dog was being abused or what.


73 posted on 12/06/2011 9:05:52 PM PST by irishtenor (Everything in moderation, however, too much whiskey is just enough... Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Stentor
Les is great!

I remember from years ago. him saying: 'buggery in the barracks... buggery in the barracks'!!!!!!

74 posted on 12/06/2011 9:38:02 PM PST by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
This Country is spiraling down into the abyss of horrible degradation. The only antidote is Jesus Christ. Anyone who believes had better get a lot more serious about their faith and start praying, repenting of our sins, fasting for our Country and also preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the sinners. Even if they do not completely repent the very preaching of it causes them to become more moral.

If we care about our Country God is our one and only hope. Most of us have played with our lives like children and it is time for us to grow up in our faith and hope and pray for The LORD to be merciful to us and turn our us and our Country around. It won't happen without us believing, understanding that before anything else we fight not against flesh and blood but we fight a spiritual battle against wickedness in the heavenly places and the weapons we use must be spiritual.

75 posted on 12/07/2011 1:05:24 AM PST by Bellflower (Judas Iscariot, first democrat, robber, held the money bag, claimed to care for poor: John 12:4-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

This whole “Laws shouldn’t be based on morals” thing is as wrong as the day is long. ALL laws should be moral.

It is IMMORAL to steal, hence we have laws against that.

It is IMMORAL to kill (murder) hence we have laws against that.

It is IMMORAL to engage in certain kinds of sex, hence, there Should Be laws against that.

If you do not have laws based on Morality (Or that which is Right), then it stands to reason that the laws you get will not be Moral, but Immoral.


76 posted on 12/07/2011 6:14:42 AM PST by RoadGumby (For God so loved the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

Is Michelle wearing a pillowcase? What is that?

I thought it was a parachute but then I saw the label.


77 posted on 12/07/2011 8:35:46 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The Democrats just don’t wish to alienate a potential liberal voting bloc for them.


78 posted on 12/07/2011 11:46:45 AM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

if someone equates sodomy to bestiality as equals, they’re probably a perv democrat.


79 posted on 12/08/2011 11:40:41 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Congress: Looting the future to bribe the present.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson