Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
If someone is willing to vote for Newt, then they might as well consider Romney and Huntsman. And out of the three, Huntsman is probably the best choice.

I won't vote for Newt. No way. He's by far the worst of the three. Not even sure I'd vote for him against Obama. I might write in Bugs Bunny if it's Newt v Obama.

But, Newt has plenty of time to implode. Here's hoping he does. And soon.

9 posted on 12/07/2011 2:55:57 PM PST by Huck (LIBERTY is the object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

Exactly. There is no difference between Newt, Romney and Huntsman. They are all centrist republicans.

Amnesty, individual mandate, global warming and every trendy liberal cause in the last 10 years, Newt was there.

They are very similar but only Newt has openly attacked tea parties “radical rightwing social engineering” and in ny23.

In primaries, I will not vote for any of them. Amnesty is the main showstopper against Newt.


29 posted on 12/07/2011 3:13:12 PM PST by heiss (heartless and inhumane (radical rightwinger))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
I won't vote for Newt.

If you wouldn't vote for him over Obama, you're the enemy.

The second amendment won't exist as we know it if Obama gets to pick a couple more Supreme Court justices. Gay marriage will be forced on the nation. Religious freedom will be severely curtailed. And, Obamacare will be permanent entrenched as part of the healthcare system.

But, you took the principled stand and helped Obama win. What a guy!

54 posted on 12/07/2011 4:47:08 PM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson