Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/08/2011 8:01:57 AM PST by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: OldCorps

Well it’s not like the DOJ would lie about this............................... o’ never mind.


2 posted on 12/08/2011 8:11:01 AM PST by Lockbox (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldCorps

One hell of a “justice department” America has at the moment.

Kagen, gun running, money laundering, dead agent w/ sealed records.

3rd world regime.


3 posted on 12/08/2011 8:11:45 AM PST by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldCorps

The die has already been cast. If they vote to uphold this law it will go down as the most horribly tainted decision SCOTUS has ever made.


4 posted on 12/08/2011 8:12:08 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldCorps
=

What are your questions?

5 posted on 12/08/2011 8:13:54 AM PST by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldCorps

If there was ever a slam dunk instance of conflict of interest it is this one. Maybe someone should file a complaint with the Bar. A sanction or reprimand is small potatoes but it would be pretty funny to have the Bar on record countering her/their claim that there is no conflict.


6 posted on 12/08/2011 9:29:27 AM PST by 1malumprohibitum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson