Skip to comments.
Sex with animals still not OK in U.S. military (impact of pending removal of Art. 125 UCMJ)
Stars & Stripes ^
| 12/8/2011
| LEO SHANE III
Posted on 12/10/2011 6:48:49 AM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Don't ask, don't bark, don't pursue...or something like that.
To: markomalley
For their part, Pentagon officials say the deletion of bestiality is a legal technicality and does not represent any fundamental change in the military’s moral code for servicemembers (and service animals). LOL!!
2
posted on
12/10/2011 6:53:03 AM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: markomalley
Yet, an earlier congress thought it wise to include that language specifically.
3
posted on
12/10/2011 6:55:29 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
To: markomalley
bestiality is still illegal in the U.S. military Well ... ahhhh ... that just shows that we ... uhhhh ... we live in a repressive police state and ... uhhhhh ... the rich people who run our patriarchal society are ... ahhhh ... a bunch of hypocrites who hate anyone who ... uhhhh isn't white.
Yeah, that's the ticket.
Seriously: there are people who will support anything that would damage the advances achieved by western civilization over the past few millenia. These people hate everything that has been achieved, and they want us to devolve into barbarism. Their success at this is astounding to me.
4
posted on
12/10/2011 6:59:29 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Nothing will change until after the war. It's coming.)
To: markomalley
Sex with trees is ok though. (For those who want to go well beyond tree hugging.)
5
posted on
12/10/2011 7:05:46 AM PST
by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: markomalley
Our admirals and generals have been screwing the pooch for a long time.
6
posted on
12/10/2011 7:08:45 AM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: markomalley
Article 134, for example, forbids “all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces” and “all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
seems that would cover faggotry tooo...
7
posted on
12/10/2011 7:11:54 AM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: markomalley
“The department’s position on this issue remains unchanged and that act remains illegal,” said defense spokesman spindoctor Lt. Col Todd BreassealeBecause sodomy/bestiality will be illegal until the pending legislation actually takes effect, Todd can tapdance this away.
After that one can describe the acts with the word, senatornicating.
To: markomalley
The Nazi SA were faggots, too. It is how all that brutal Nazi crap started. It takes such perverted idiots to do what the Nazi did under Hitler.
9
posted on
12/10/2011 7:16:58 AM PST
by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: markomalley
Makes one wonder what the rational could be to outlaw sex with anything after codifying homo-sex. Seems once morality has no foundation then there can be no morality or is just expediency to allow homosexuals into the military and allow them to do what homos do?
10
posted on
12/10/2011 7:19:28 AM PST
by
DaveyB
(Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. -John Adams)
To: DaveyB
Makes one wonder what the rational could be to outlaw sex with anything after codifying homo-sex. Seems once morality has no foundation then there can be no morality or is just expediency to allow homosexuals into the military and allow them to do what homos do? After all...it's just a sexual preference.
And how do you know the sheep didn't consent?
11
posted on
12/10/2011 7:22:08 AM PST
by
markomalley
(Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good-Pope Leo XIII)
To: Chode
Using S&S logic, Article 134 could replace the entire UCMJ. Courts routinely toss out this language as being too vague. This is just a CYA article.
12
posted on
12/10/2011 7:31:34 AM PST
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: markomalley
The UCMJ also bans oral copulation...
13
posted on
12/10/2011 7:33:07 AM PST
by
TSgt
(Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
To: markomalley
If you outlawed sex with vegetables, the jails in San Francisco would be full.
14
posted on
12/10/2011 7:34:58 AM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: markomalley
I’ve got one word for you......gerbils.
15
posted on
12/10/2011 7:36:19 AM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: markomalley
"And how do you know the sheep didn't consent?" Did the "bleating" sound troubled or contented?
16
posted on
12/10/2011 7:38:39 AM PST
by
davisfh
To: markomalley
Wow. I saw some ugly women in the Navy, but calling it bestiality is going a bit too far...
17
posted on
12/10/2011 8:02:57 AM PST
by
EricT.
(Is a country that would re-elect Baroke Hussein Owebama really worth saving?)
To: markomalley
There goes the muslim outreach program...
18
posted on
12/10/2011 8:16:13 AM PST
by
null and void
(This is day 1054 of America's ObamaVacation from reality.)
To: markomalley
“How was your date last night?”
“Not baaaaaaa-d.”
To: coloradan
Sex with trees is ok though. (For those who want to go well beyond tree hugging.)
Knot funny...
20
posted on
12/10/2011 8:36:34 AM PST
by
null and void
(This is day 1054 of America's ObamaVacation from reality.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson