Where have our cajones gone? You tell me...
In Hillary’s lockbox.
Soooo, Lemme get this straight.
If any woman, who is being raped, kicks her attacker in the jewels, then she WILL be charged with a sexual assault?
Is that how it works for you idiot liberals?
Crazy.
This story wasn’t stupid enough when it charged this kid for defencing himself it got totally retarded when they charged the victim a, 7 year old with a sexual assault.
Some stories just make you want to take the idiots who do things like this and just shake them until their eyes rattle. I know: No shaking.
The beauty of a zero-tolerance policy is it keeps you from having to think about things.
was the bully charged with assault?
the parents should sue. there was no sexual assault in this case. it was self defense. SUE!
These major liberal town attract those who are to lazy to work and wish to live on welfare. They are succumbing to an evil that God can only deal with.Without the high taxes and government like Obama wants they cannot survive. It is time for hard working honest Americans to face the facts and take our communities back from these thugs.Liberal judges bring this about also. A few weeks ago 5 black thugs beat one white kid almost to death. They ended up with probation. Time to stand up and be counted if you wish to survive liberalism in America.
This line of thinking as I recall is similar in the UK. Defend yourself from a burglar and the homeowner is the bad guy. Amazing!
Greedy lawyers....the plague upon a once free and sane America.
If they want to charge Mark with sexual assault, then the parents should demand that the bully be charged with attempted murder.
Where have our cajones gone? You tell me...
Young Mark desrerves an “attaboy” for standing up for himself. Instead, he will be singled out and neutered by the hand wringing femi-nazi types. Word of advice for young Mark: ditch that sh!thole of a state as soon as you can and go somewhere you are allowed to stand up for yourself, you know, like our Founding Fathers intended.
If he had ATTACKED the other boy by kicking him in the groin, THAT would have been sexual assault. But defending yourself against an attacker is NOT sexual assault. What is it with liberals that they can't tell the difference?
The Left wants to be the bully, and more and more each day they are.
Ask yourself this question: What if the charges were placed by the cops instead of a school? Should something so idiotic, unconstitutional and immoral be in any way manner shape or form countenanced by a citizen? If you respond to such charges in the context of the criminal justice system YOU are as idiotic as the left, and you are powerless. You WILL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST “IDIOTIC” CHARGES LEVELED FOR THE PURPOSE OF BEATING YOU DOWN, WITH A LOGICAL, REASONED ARGUMENT. Would you give up your freedom to make a point? That is where all of this stupidity is going.
They both fight dirty! When I was a boy, fights lasted until one kid cried or was pinned to the ground. This “bully” sounds psycho.
More Leftwing BS.
FRiends, as a lifelong resident of Massachusetts you have no idea how much I worry about ever having to use my night-stand sidearm in the way God intended.
Should I pop some intruder inside my house, there is absolutely no question that I would face the full legal workup. I could be covered with defensive wounds, or even fighting for my life in the intensive care unit, and still they’d prosecute me every crime they could dream up. Assault with a deadly weapon would only be the start.
Self-defense? Castle Doctrine? Never heard of either in Massachusetts. And I’m one of the lucky few to hold a License to Carry, which allows me to own and even purchase (if it’s on the Secretary of State’s “approved” list) handguns.
You have no idea.