Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

Reread my post. You know, the part about endless cycles of war in Iraq at any sitting president’s pleasure. I had no problem going in there in the first place and kicking asses. We should have left after that with saddam hanging froma lamp post with a sign pinned to his chest promising to come back and kick their asses again if they ever assist others in attacking us.
Unless missles are enroute, we have time to decide if we want to go to war. You sound like obama and the demonrats who are always in a big rush to push their garbage through before anyone can figure out what’s going on.


59 posted on 12/11/2011 4:21:36 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Scotsman will be Free

Reread my post. You know, the part about endless cycles of war in Iraq at any sitting president’s pleasure
I've heard that liberal propaganda before. Question is, why do you believe it? You think we have endless money to fund so-called "endless cycles of war" et cetera?!? Sounds like something repeated verbatim from Bertelsmann media.

We should have left after that with saddam hanging froma lamp post with a sign pinned to his chest promising to come back and kick their asses again if they ever assist others in attacking us
You know what that would have done, right? It would have resulted in Iran taking over Iraq sooner. And since you have therein left Iran untouched, the Islamic Iraqis' heart to "ever assist others in attacking us" would have been even stronger, since all you did was run away after the initial "shock and awe" rather than having the heart to impose your will.

Unless missiles are en route, we have time to decide if we want to go to war
Eh? That's the Pearl Harbor mentality. It's as bad as the mentality that Truman had vis-à-vis his firing MacArthur (which in itself was worse, since Red China actually attacked us and Truman wanted to do nothing about it whereas MacArthur wanted to counterattack . . . there's a reason why The Art Of War says "If fighting is sure to result in victory, then you must fight, even though the ruler forbid it").

Iraq and Afghanistan were supposed to be staging grounds for finally wiping the Islamic Republic off the face of the map, out of Iran Persia. But that fact gets lost in the mire of all the anti-war liberal/libertarian propaganda.

You sound like obama and the demonrats who are always in a big rush to push their garbage through before anyone can figure out what’s going on
You mean the same "Obama and the Demonrats" who are pulling out of Iraq right now and are trying to run away from what they dubbed the "War of Necessity" in Afghanistan? Yeah, they sound like real war hawks, don't they? Funny how you make the invalid comparison with their pushing through domestic socialist programs with something that the Obama administration is not doing (expanding wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in order to defeat Islamic terrorism in Iran and Pakistan, never mind the Levant). Gotta love your consistency . . .
62 posted on 12/11/2011 11:07:09 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson