Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaduz
Wonder why they risked a drone when a satllite could see the same thing?,or are they looking at something else??.

Satellites can't take air samples to check for radiation, for one. Nor do they deliver a hellfire missile to a target.

Satellites in low orbit pass overhead rather rapidly. Drones loiter, and grab excellent photos, even in, shall we say, non-visible spectra. Satellites in high orbit may be stationary over a target, true, but the extra distance in that high orbit negates much of that optical resolution. Better to have a low-flying drone.

Sauron

33 posted on 12/11/2011 4:02:50 AM PST by sauron ("Truth is hate to those who hate Truth" --unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: sauron

Better to have a low-flying drone may be true but is the risk worth it?.Can they use the tech to find a way to down one?.


34 posted on 12/11/2011 4:15:07 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson