Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney -- Has It Really Come Down to This?
Fox News ^ | November 28, 2011 | John LeBoutillier

Posted on 12/12/2011 11:12:28 AM PST by Clintonfatigued

So the Republican race – in a year when President Obama is totally beatable -- has come to this: Newt Gingrich, serial philanderer, liar, hypocrite, secret Rockefeller Republican, back-stabber and megalomaniac versus Mitt Romney, the Supreme Panderer, the man-with-no-principles, an utter phony who will say anything and flip-flop at any time – and someone who was not a Reaganite until he ran for president in 2007.

How can the GOP have sunk so low?

Two candidates so flawed, so inherently fraudulent and so phony.

It is almost as if the Republican Party wanted to help Obama get re-elected.

Clearly the GOP primary voters and caucus attendees do not want Mitt Romney. After six years of running, we have seen enough. We don’t buy Mitt. Period. Even while all his flavor-of-the-month opponents have come and gone, Mitt never goes up. The others come and go – and Mitt just keeps steady with about 20% of the GOP vote. Period.

How can a party end up nominating someone who only has tepid support from a disbelieving party base? How can that party support someone with 80% of the voters wanting someone else?

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Made In The USA

What good does it do to beat Obama with someone who will not undo what has been done?


21 posted on 12/12/2011 11:28:55 AM PST by Ingtar (Newt (four more for Obama) & Mitt (Obamacare) - what wonderful choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

John LeBoutillier and Fox anti-News can KMA.

Go Newt Go.....


22 posted on 12/12/2011 11:29:42 AM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~.. Newt/Palin-West-2012."got a lot swirling around in my head.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yes, it has come down to that. Our Beltway masters have decided that, once again, we will have a moderate/progressive GOP candidate for President and eliminated conservative contenders until they got what they wanted. It’s either death by hanging or death by firing squad. Your choice.

What amazes me is how many people I know to be conservative who don’t mind being shoved to the back of the bus again with Noot. They see a debater. I see a shape-shifter.


23 posted on 12/12/2011 11:30:16 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Why, yes. I AM in a bad mood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Something I don’t understand—Newt has a lifetime ACU rating of 90 yet is labeled a Rockefeller Republican.

Are the ACU ratings bogus?


24 posted on 12/12/2011 11:31:24 AM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

John, weren’t you the Congressman who couldn’t hold on to your House seat??????????

John, just shut up. The Republican voters will decide their candidate. Go back to what you were doing!


25 posted on 12/12/2011 11:31:24 AM PST by veritas2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
>>>>>Two candidates so flawed, so inherently fraudulent and so phony.

Newt is better than Romney and worth a last man standing vote against Obama. Nothing more. Romney rejected the Reagan agenda and the Contract With America from the get-go. While Newt stood with Reagan in the 80's and gave us the Republican Revolution in 1994, Newt has also said the era of Reagan was over and that will not inspire conservatives. Newt may be a great rhetorician, but he's not a great communicator. Newt places expediency over principle far too often and displays far too many progressive tendencies. Newt debating Obama would be fun to watch. Problem is, Newt can not beat Obama. Newt's ethical and moral downsides will lead to his downfall.

26 posted on 12/12/2011 11:32:17 AM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy

I think Gingrich as President may end up surprising you.

He’ll have no reason to cowtow to the Republican Leadership after past events, and not only knows what needs to be done, but what is politically possible to do.

REAGAN II?
Maybe not. But the potential is there.


27 posted on 12/12/2011 11:32:57 AM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

The problem for many is that people look outside themselves for the answers. The answer lies within us as well as the seed of our eternal destruction. We have a choice. We either accept what the Holy Spirit is saying or we resist it.


28 posted on 12/12/2011 11:34:57 AM PST by marbren (I do not know but, Thank God, God knows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

It is true that the American people have “lost it.” This is evidenced by the fact that they elected a member of the Third World as president.The fact that we have “lost it” is the reality of our times. The question has become: with the people we elevate to candidacy who can best ameliorate our current situation?


29 posted on 12/12/2011 11:35:01 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

In 2008, we had the choice of McCain, Romney or Huckabee running against an energized ‘anyone but Bush’

In 2012 we have the choice of Gingrich or Romney (with a remote possibility of Bachmann/Perry/Santorum), running against a failed Obama.

I consider this a VAST improvement over the 2008 choices.


30 posted on 12/12/2011 11:37:04 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Another turd speaks. What is with these people? Newt must have banged his wife or something.


31 posted on 12/12/2011 11:37:29 AM PST by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Sounds like John LeBoutillier has gotten big, fat, and out-of-control.


32 posted on 12/12/2011 11:38:01 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT (I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Soldier,
Please tell us whom you are campaigning for and when and where?

Iowa in December for MB, RS, perry?


33 posted on 12/12/2011 11:39:18 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT (I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I’ve never been happy with the Republican field. Still, any of them would be better than Barry, whom I consider a clear and present danger to the Republic.


34 posted on 12/12/2011 11:41:58 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
The only hope is that these two beat the heck out of each other but do not secure enough delegates to capture the nomination early. Then, maybe in the late winter or early spring a new candidate – an electable conservative with principles -- can enter the race.

I don't remember this guy from his time in Congress, and this statement makes it apparent why. The guy is a loon.

States have ballot deadlines, etc., that candidates can't miss if they want to win the nomination. The idea that someone is going to come out of the woodwork in "late-winter or early Spring" (that's March-April), enter the race, and win the nomination, is nuts. They'd be too late to meet most of the deadlines and even get on the ballot. There wouldn't be money left, there wouldn't be time to vet them, and the other people still in the race would still be fighting.

Perhaps he has some particular candidate in mind who he thinks could overcome all that, but then, why not mention the name so people could determine for themselves if it was possible? And why wouldn't a candidate capable of not announcing until March and yet winning the nomination have run at the outset? Assuming such a candidate even exists?

This guy's logic doesn't even pass the straight-face test, and this reads more like an emotional temper-tantrum than any kind of professional "analysis".

35 posted on 12/12/2011 11:41:58 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I completely agree with this article. So dang depressing. It has always been the Republicans who can screw a presidential election, but this time is WORSE because the Conservatives are helping....that is the disgusting part.
36 posted on 12/12/2011 11:45:08 AM PST by napscoordinator (Anybody but Romney, Newt, Perry, Huntsman, Paul. Perry and Obama are 100 percent the same!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Let us hope something unexpected will happen to give us another choice.

Such as WHO, John? Bachmann, Cain, Perry, Romney and now Gingrich have either flirted with or sat at the top spot. Huntsman and Paul are worse than any of these, and Santorum isn't getting any traction. Palin, DeMint, Pence et al took a pass.

You go to war with what you have, not what you want.

37 posted on 12/12/2011 11:45:44 AM PST by ScottinVA (I miss America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Our choices this time are infinitely better that what we had last time.

McCain?

Huckleberry (or whatever his name is)?

I forget the rest.

38 posted on 12/12/2011 11:46:02 AM PST by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Le Boutillier is a NY raised, Harvard-educated silver-spooner who ran for congress on money from his mother. For him to call Gingrich a Rockefeller Republican is a real laugher

Every time someone says Newt’s colleagues do not support him think: Sarah Palin. Newt is very much like Palin. He fought corruption in the Congress and the insiders never forgave him. They drummed him out of office. Don’t believe me? Check out the Contract with America to see how much of it concerns corruption in Congress.

Every article like this is an effort to suppress the Republican vote and limit Republican contributions in the general election. Intentional or not, Le Boutllier is now one of Barry’s best friends.


39 posted on 12/12/2011 11:48:01 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I do believe we may be AGAIN seeing the unprincipled, unethical, untrustworthy, perfidious repobates of the contaminated and fetid news media (read MSM) leading the lemmings of the Republic to ‘their’ free will choice of a Presidential candidate.

Shades of out past debacle rearing its ugly head.


40 posted on 12/12/2011 11:48:16 AM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson